Introduction
● The opposition between subjectivism and objectivism is artificial, and divides the social
sciences
○ we must identify the presuppositions they share as theoretical modes of
knowledge
■ theoretical as opposed to the practical mode of
knowledge of ordinary experience
■ hence we must objectify the epistemological and social
conditions of both subjective and objective experience
○ phenomenological knowledge can teach us with perfect certainty the
truth of the primary relationship of familiarity with the familiar environment
■ but it cannot go beyond description - it takes the world
as self-evident, without asking why experience is as it is (doesn’t ask what the
conditions of possibility of such experience are)
● phenomenology doesn’t take into
account the coincidence of objective structures and internalized
structures that give the illusion of immediate understanding
○ objectivism sets out to establish objective regularities - structures, laws,
systems of relationships - introduces a radical discontinuity between practical and
theoretical knowledge
■ explicit representations of practical knowledge are seen
as ideologies
■ it challenges the project of reducing social science to
constructs of the constructs made by actors (as phenomenologists do)
● or accounts of the accounts of agents,
which are seen to produce the meaning of the social world
■ Saussurian semiology claims that immediate
understanding presupposes that agents are ‘objectively attuned so as to associate
the same meaning with the same sign’ (i.e. share precisely the same language)
■ BUT objectivism forgets that primary experience is the
condition and product of its objectification
● hence it fails to objectify its own
objectifying relationship
○ it doesn’t explore the
conditions that allow it to ‘take for granted the meaning
objectified in institutions’
● So to move beyond this antagonism we must explore the conditions of all theoretical
knowledge
○ we must not only break with native experience, but also break with the
position of the objective observer, who brings into the object the principles of his relation
to the object
■ knowledge is not only relative to viewpoint - the very
taking up of a viewpoint on a practice constitutes it as an object
● Philosophy has tended to reject practice as uncomtemplative, and reify contemplation as
providing true, objective knowledge, without questioning its presuppositions
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.