Rosemary Crompton and Michael Mann - Gender and Stratification
Introduction
● Stratification theory since WW2 has been influenced by the class analyses of Marx and
Weber
○ these were distinct from both the consensual and conflict-based analyses
of post-war society
● Class analysis (particularly Marxist class analysis) focuses on social relationships rather
than individual attributes
○ this has a tendency to depersonalize the agent, including making the
agent non-gendered
○ gender is seen as being subordinate to class in examining socioeconomic
stratification (partly because, if women are economically dependent on working men,
then the have a class identity)
○ women are not seen as constituting a class, and status differences
between them mean they cannot be a status group
● This depersonalization continued with structuralism, which saw classes as positions in the
social organization rather than collections of individuals
○ organization of production created empty spaces, and it was relatively
unimportant who filled them (cf. Hartmann)
■ hence gender remained obscured
● Women are excluded from the analysis of class stratification because:
○ for Weberians, if women’s life chances are not determined by the market,
then they can be regarded as beyond the boundaries of class theory
○ for Marxists, women are members of a class insofar as the occupy
particular positions relative to the forces of production
■ their subjection can be understood through the lens of
the prevailing economic relations and exploitation
● Feminists argue that the subjection of women is not to be seen as secondary to class
oppression
○ patriarchal relations are geographically and historically almost universal,
and thus cannot be considered secondary to capitalist relations
● Reluctance to abandon class theory among feminists has led to dual systems theories,
according to which gender and capitalism are distinct, yet interact and are instrumental in
establishing social stratification/status etc
○ e.g. Hartmann - capitalism creates the places for a hierarchy of workers,
gender/race hierarchies tell us who fills them
■ the problem with this is that the two (or three) cannot be
untangled analytically or historically - the development of capitalist economic
relations was influenced by gender and race related processes, as well as other
structures - states, war, religion etc
● Hartmann is right to introduce more
factors into social stratification analysis, but needs to go further, and not
rely on drawing sharp dividing lines
● Empirical research in stratification sociology is likely to look at occupation structure and
income inequality
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.53. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.