100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Voting behaviour and the Media $5.82
Add to cart

Other

Voting behaviour and the Media

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Detailed, thorough notes on Voting Behaviour and the Media based on the suggested Edexcel A-Level textbook

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • September 22, 2022
  • 9
  • 2018/2019
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Voting behaviour and the Media

Definitions:
 Manifesto: the document in which a political party details what actions and programmes it intends to
introduce if it is successful in the next election - a set of promises for future action
 Mandate: the authority to govern, which a government derives from an election victory. This means that it
has the right to introduce its policies as stated in its manifesto. It also allows it to take decisions on other
issues as they arise during its term of office, which could not have been foreseen when the manifesto was
produced.
 Class dealignment: the process where individuals no longer identify themselves as belonging to a certain class
and fail to make a class connection with their voting choice
 Partisan dealignment: the process where individuals no longer identify themselves on a long-term basis by
being associated with a certain political party
 Disillusion: disappointment from discovering something is not good as one believed it to be; for example,
having no confidence in politics and politicians as being able to solve issues and make a difference
 Apathy: lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern; for example, not caring about political activity, as
manifested in low turnout at elections and poor awareness of contemporary events
 Government competency: the perceived ability of the government party in office to manage the affairs of
state effectively. It also applies to how voter regard the potential competency of an opposition party, if it
were to win office

Case studies of three key general elections:

The elections held in 1979, 1997 and 2010 are regarded as critical turning points in post-war politics. A number of
aspects including the impact of party policies, the manifesto and the techniques parties used in their election
campaigns explain the outcomes. Wider context like the state of the economy, the public image of party leaders,
and the assessment that voters make of the government's record may also play an important role in determining
the result.

1979
 initiated 18 years of Conservative rule (Thatcher until 1990, Major until 1997)
 called after Callaghan's minority government lost a vote of no confidence in the House of Commons
 Thatcher's majority modest, increased in 1983 and 1987
 Labour's decent into a prolonged left/right infighting over policy until reinvention of the party under Tony
Blair
 turnout: 76%, majority: 43

Party Number of seats Increase/loss of seats % of popular vote
Conservatives 339 +62 43.9
Labour 269 -50 36.9
Liberal 11 -2 13.8

Both the Labour and Conservative manifestoes were notable for their moderation of party policies and manifesto.
Both gave high priority to bringing down inflation. Callaghan resisted pressure for more extreme proposals from
his party's left wing. Thatcher's policy contained little indication that she intended to move her party to the right;
whilst there was mention of returning recently nationalised industry to private hands and removing some trade

, union powers, there was no suggestion of radical change - Callaghan had little credibility when he warned the
electorate of a lurch the right if the Conservatives won.

The Conservatives adopted many of the techniques of modern advertising (under specialist Gordon Reece and
Tim Bell). The Labour campaign lacked awareness of finer points of presentation, whereas Thatcher took
advantage of the invention of photo opportunities. The real impact of the campaign is hard to measure; the
Conservatives outpaced Labour in opinion polls but, due to respect for his experience, Callaghan was 20 points
ahead on who would make the better prime minister. Thatcher turned down the offer of a televised debate
wisely, which would have highlighted Callaghan's experience.

The real reason for Thatcher's victory was the weakness of the Labour government. Despite Callaghan's personal
popularity, there was no doubt the Conservatives would win. Callaghan's government was a minority
administration, which was very vulnerable to defeat in the Commons. Callaghan also mistimed the election; the
winter of discontent and the government's attempt to impose a 5% limit of pay increases collapsing as a series of
strike created a sense of national paralysis. Callaghan failed to control militant trade unions, and this allowed the
media to show images of a miserable, strike-bound Britain. When the Sun accused him of being out of touch
following his Caribbean island summit meeting he remarked, 'Crisis? What Crisis?'; this because an irresistible
theme for the Conservatives. It was clear that the country needed a new direction and a government that could
grapple with the economic and social breakdown. The election was triggered by a withdrawal of support for the
government by nationalist parties, forcing Callaghan to go to the country at the worst possible time for his party.

1997
 landslide victory of New Labour, opened the way to 13 years of Labour government
 Tony Blair was prime minister until 2007, succeed by Gordon Brown
 Liberal Democrats emerged as a significant third force
 Conservatives troubled by ongoing divisions, poor leadership and inability to appear relevant to
contemporary society
 turnout: 71.4%, majority: 179

Party Number of seats Increase/loss of seats % of popular vote
Labour 416 +145 432
Conservative 165 -178 30.7
Liberal 46 +28 16.8

Tony Blair drove forward the policy of modernisation. The 'New Labour' project abandoned old fashion policies
(e.g. nationalisation, tax increases and the strengthening of trade unions) which might put off middle-class voters,
but instead gave off touch signals on law and order, and emphasised links to the business community. Labour won
the endorsement of the greater part of the press including the Sun and the Times. The message was that the New
Labour was a moderate party. To show how responsible the party was, it used its 1997 platform to stress specific
policy details where it promised to make a difference (e.g. reducing the size of primary school class and cutting
hospital waiting lists). Also, Blair's emphasis on constitutional reform gave it common ground with the Liberal
Democrats, making it easier for Liberal Democrats to tactfully vote for Labour in marginal seats, possibly adding
30 seats to Labour's majority.

New Labour placed a huge emphasis on developing a professional election campaign, employing public relation
experts to handle the media and using focus groups to assess public opinion and target marginal seats. However,
the importance of Labour's campaign should not be exaggerated as Labour's share of the vote increased by 12.5%

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller seller3333. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.82
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added