MSc MME Management, Economics And Consumer Studies
CPT23306 (CPT23306)
All documents for this subject (2)
Seller
Follow
Veer6699
Reviews received
Content preview
CPT Lecture notes
Lecture 1
Persuasion: traditions
Aristotle
1. Logos (logical arguments: message)
2. Pathos (emotional appeals: audience)
3. Ethos (good character of the speaker: communicator)
→ Six weapons of influence – Cialdini (Lecture 6)
Persuasion
“Persuasion as a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people to change their own
attitudes or behaviors regarding an issue through the transmission of a message in an atmosphere of free choice.”
- Relies on symbols: words, signs, images
- Involves an attempt to influence: deliberative, intentional, conscious
- Entails self-persuasion: persuadee make the change
- Requires transmission of message: arguments, cues
- Assumes free choice: option to do not follow persuader
Persuasion vs. coercion
Deception: the action of deceiving (bedriegen) someone
Incentivization: attaching a reward to a given behavior, or threatening a penalty for failing to do that behavior
Coercion: the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.
Persuasion vs. propaganda/manipulation
- Persuasion differs from propaganda ‘in its aims, in the means it uses, in the pressure it exerts, and in the
range of people it affects’ – Mulholland, 2003
- Three common features of propaganda
o Control over the transmission of information
o Is directed towards masses of individuals
o And uses covert messages that disguise the true intent (=manipulation) – Perloff, 2020
- Propaganda: the deliberate systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct
behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist. – Jowett & O’Donnell,
2014
1
,Persuasion as transactional communication: an example
Perspectives in persuasion
- Persuasion is ubiquitous in contemporary life
- Self-persuasion is central: we convince and change ourselves in response to persuasion
- Two very different ways people frequently process persuasive information: one effortful, the other more
automatic (dual processing);
- Adopting an ethical approach to persuasion is crucial, particularly in an era of ever-subtle technological
tricks.
- Ideas and concepts shade into each other: grey zones!
2
,Lecture 2 Rational Deliberation
Rational deliberation in persuasion in consumer communication for sustainability
Part 1: what are conditions for rational discourse and how are claims and controversies deliberated?
Part 2: what makes a strong argument and how do debates change levels?
Learning objectives:
- Understand principles of (ideal) rational deliberation
- Describe how claims/controversies on different levels trigger different types of discourses
- Describe rhetorical …
Part 1
The problem
We learn to use communication in an instrumental way in different roles: systematic distortion of communication
Spaces for understanding and deliberation needed
Instrumental communication action examples: training a sports team, buy a car
How to create spaces for rational deliberation
Rational discourse: what are features, characteristics, requirements, …?
Juergen Habermas:
- All people possess rationality → everyone is able to argue in a rational way
- All people are free and equal → how to structure the debates
- All people need to have a say in issues that affect them → include people who are affected by decisions that are
made
- All decision can be made in a consensual and rational way
→ influential in research on ‘deliberative democracy’
Some features of ‘ideal speech situations’
- Goal: communicative action – reaching consensus
- Procedural rules: no coercion; equality, inclusiveness
- Logical rules: no contradictions, inconsistencies, or equivocations → using same words with different
meaning
- Presuppositions to agree on ‘validity’
o Sincerity → if a speaker is authenticity, seriousness about topic, speaking truth, not manipulative
o Truth → a fact, what we say should be based on facts, evidence-based arguments, others can validate
o Rightness → must be appropriate and legitimate to say something, moral rules and principles
How to work with these validity claims
Habermans is on the left side of the figure from post-reading lecture 1 (Bakir et al.)
Types of discourses (gesprekken)
3
, What are different types of discourses that are used in deliberation?
- Explicative discourse: is it clear and understandable → connection was out
- Practical discourse: is it relevant and justified → disclaimers slide
- Theoretical discourse: is it true and effective?
Validity claims and controversies
What are different types of issues and claims that need to be clarified? Staircase for reflective practice
Sustainability meta labelling → deliberating what more general sustainability label should include
1. Physical clarity = someone could say that the definition of criteria of the label should be publicly available
→ I think that the definitions of the criteria and the measurement procedures should be publicly available!
2. Syntactic clarity
→ should a global sustainability label use metric or imperial measurements?
3. Semantic clarity = define what labeling scheme means by indicator
→ What do you mean by “indicator”? An indicator that cannot be measured is not an indicator to me.
4. Relevance
→ I don’t think that diversity aspect of a company’s executive board should be a relevant criterion for product
sustainability
5. Expressive validity = speakers’ honesty
→ Regarding the communication of the label, I think it’s overstated to say that it actually IS a totally sustainable
product. Not buying it is still more sustainable, but we don’t want to communicate that!
6. Empirical validity = evidence based, reliability, measuring carbon footprint
→ Is a carbon footprint really a reliable way to infer that a product is “climate neutral”?
7. Normative validity = rightfulness, appropriateness, morally appropriate
→ Is what the label claims about “locally sources” actually in line with current law?Is it morally right to exit
trade contracts with Global South countries to source locally?
8. Instrumental rationality = simple questions if all discourses have been clarified
→ Is printing the label on products in color actually necessary?
9. Strategic rationality = thinking about the effects of a certain action
→ Shouldn’t we be printing the label on the front of products instead of the back to educate consumers and
change their behavior?
10. Aesthetic rationality = thinking about aesthetics of it
→ Is a sparsely leafed tree really the best representation of the type of rich flourishing we want to associate
with sustainability?
11. Communicative rationality = does anyone agree?
→ Does everyone agree with what we have achieved so far? Any further comments?
→ match the discourses to the validity issues! Not need to know exactly for the exam!
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Veer6699. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
