100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Global Governance - Human Rights and Environment $5.79   Add to cart

Other

Global Governance - Human Rights and Environment

 25 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Detailed, thorough notes on Global Governance - Human Rights and Environment based on the suggested Edexcel A-Level textbook

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • September 26, 2022
  • 11
  • 2018/2019
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Global Governance: Human Rights and Environment

Key definitions:
 human rights: rights that people are entitled to by virtue of being human
 universal human rights: rights that apply to people of all societies regardless of cultural or
other differences
 international law: laws that govern states and other international actors
 International Court of Justice (ICJ): the principle judicial organ of the United Nations
 International Criminal Court (ICC): organisation that prosecutes individuals for the
international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes
 International tribunal: organisations set up to prosecute individuals in specific states for the
crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes
 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): an international
environmental treaty negotiated at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janerio in 1992
 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): UN body set up in 1988 as an
internationally accepted authority on climate change
 sustainability: the capacity to endure
 sustainable development: development that meets the needs of the present, without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs
 tragedy of the commons: situation within a shared-resource system where individual users
acting independently and rationally according to their own self-interest behave contrary to
the common good of all users by depleting that resource
 global commons: area and resources that are un-owned and consequently beyond national
jurisdiction

Human Rights

Human rights are entitlements that are inherent to all human beings irrespective of anything (e.g.
sex, age, religion, sexuality, language, race). They are universal (applicable to all human beings) and
inalienable (they should not be taken away). The event s of WWII led to the prioritising of human
rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, which was the basis for the European
Convention on Human Rights of 1950 and is widely acknowledged to be the foundation of
international human rights law.

There is tension between the concept of universal and inalienable rights, and the sovereignty of the
state.

International law is essentially the rules governing relationships between states. There is debate
about the concept of international law as, in an international system, there is no compulsion as
states are sovereign. International law is not codified but there are a number of sources (e.g. treaties
and conventions, international custom (e.g. diplomatic immunity, the general principles of law
recognised by civilised nations, judicial decisions, legal writings). The Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals
after the WWII were significant in the development of international law on human rights.

, International Court of Justice
 founded in 1945 and based in The Hague (Netherlands)
 main arbitration organ of the UN
 adjudicates on disputed between member states of the UN and makes judgements on issues
brought to it by UN organisations and specialist agencies

International Criminal Court
 came into force in 2002 (set up by the 1998 Rome Statute), based in The Hague and separate
to the ICJ
 responsible for investigating and putting on trials individuals who have been accused of
some of the most horrific crimes in the world (e.g. genocide, war crimes)
 permanent court that replaces the ad hoc trials that have been used to bring prosecutions
against suspected war criminals and despots (Yugoslavia and Rwanda)
 aim is to work in addition to national courts, not replace them; only tries a case where a
national court system has not been willing or able to bring an individual to justice = court of
last resort
 124 states have signed up to the Rome Statute but some countries (USA, China, India and
Israel) not bound by the full requirements of the court
 October 2016 = South Africa, Burundi and the Gambia announced that they were going to
withdraw from the Rome Statute = perception among African countries that the ICC is biased
against Africans = most ICC investigations and trials have been of African and only Africans
have been issues arrest warrants = makes the ICC look like a colonial organisation
 Russia looks like it will remove its signature, predictably as it may face punishment over the
annexation of Crimea and its action in the Syrian Civil War

Special UN tribunals
 two notable UN international tribunals = forerunners to the International Criminal Court
 International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1993) = set up to bring to justice
those responsible for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Balkans
 International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda = set up as a response to the genocide and mass
killings (1994) = indicted 93 individuals

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
 Council of Europe (1949) = set up in response to human-rights abuses of the Holocaust
 ECHR aims to promote human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Europe
 47 states = all signed to European Convention of Human Rights, upheld by the European
Court of Human Rights (based in Strasbourg)
 the ECHR (not related to the EU) = court of last resort for individuals or groups who feel that
their rights have been breached by a signatory state = they may appeal to the court to have
their case heard if all other legal avenues have been exhausted
 Court's rulings are not directly enforceable but all signatory states have agreed under
international treaty to uphold its rulings

Sources of authority, including the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights: In the immediate
aftermath of WWII there were two international tribunals to deal with those responsible for

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller seller3333. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.79
  • (0)
  Add to cart