100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Source Analysis on Gershom Scholem $9.55
Add to cart

Essay

Source Analysis on Gershom Scholem

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The essay is about the German-Jewish divide on a source written by Gershom Scholem

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • October 5, 2022
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
In what ways does this source present a divided German Jewish community?




The sentiment of the majority of Jewish Germans is echoed through the words of Jakob Wassermann,

a novelist, ‘I am German and I am a Jew’. 1Yet Zionists such as Gershom Schloem disregarded the

idea of the assimilated Jew, who believed their Jewish and German identities to be inextricably

interlinked, thus viewing Germans and Jews as ‘mutually exclusive entities’ 2. Schloem writing

retrospectively on his youth in his book ‘From Berlin to Jerusalem’ refers to his experience in Munich

allowing the reader to identify a divided German Jewish community. Throughout the source

Scholem’s ability to see is juxtaposed with the Munich Jews inability to see. His description of their

‘blindness’ as ‘frightening’ heightens the impending danger that Jews would be subjected to that

Zionists / Schloem hinted at. This notion of being able to ‘see’ highlights his reason for adhering to

Zionism and remaining a Zionist, some 50 years later, as well as justifying and subtly glorifying his
1
Kauders, Anthony: Weimar Jewry, in: Anthony McElliot, Weimar Germany pp. 234-259.

2
Ibid

, decision, and other Zionists, instinctual and timely move to Palestine. In turn showing the Jewish

community in Germany as divided between those who emigrated versus those who stayed.


The source begins by mentioning the ‘incipient Nazism’. Post war Germany saw an increased hostility

towards Jewish community which Nazis exploited. The 1916 census was taken in order confirm the

lack of patriotism among German Jews. The end of the war gave rise to the stab in the back Myth,

perpetuating the idea that there were internal traitors i.e Jews in order to deflect responsibility away

from the German military leadership. These two events gave rise to a national Anti-Semitic response.

Schloem mentions the lack of acknowledgement of both the Nazism and growing Antisemitic stance

in Germany by the Liberal Jewish community in Germany leaving him to associate with a few ‘like

minded people’. Interestingly, the Liberal German Jewish community were facing difficulties on

multiple fronts on holding on to their German identities. The Eastern Jewish immigration comprising

of those who fled from persecution as well as those enlisted by the wartime military government was

19%. The community of Jewish liberals felt that their identity as both German and Jewish would be

threatened as the 19% of foreign Jews would open up the space to further challenge the Jews on their

belief on belonging to the German nation. Thus this ‘jumpy’ and ‘angry’ reaction by ‘Munich Jews’

Schloem noted, when Nazism was mentioned, would have further provoked an identity crisis. As the

Nazis were a group that clearly identified Germans and Jews as different welcoming ‘Germans’ yet

stating that ‘Jews [would] not be admitted’.


The divide between the German Jewish community is further presented in the source through the

mentioning of Munich. The historical significance of Munich to the beginning of the Zionist

movement would have been one familiar to Gershom Schloem. His inability to associate with the

‘Munich Jews’ would have been exasperated by Munich being the same city in which a ‘chorus of

protest arose’ when Theodor Herzl, the father of modern political Zionism and an icon to Schloem

who had his portrait hung on a Christmas tree, called for the first Zionist Congress. The congress was

rejected due to a fear that the Zionist movement would suggest a lack of loyalty to Germany. The

language used throughout the source by Schloem of the ‘jumpy’ nature of Munich Jews mirrors the

fear showed, a little over 20 years, prior by the Munich Jews in rejection to the Congress. Schloem

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zaynabrahman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.55. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.55
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added