100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
First Class Tort Law (Complete) Notes $17.49   Add to cart

Class notes

First Class Tort Law (Complete) Notes

 43 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

First Class Tort Law Notes is applicable to all UK LLB syllabuses outlining: negligence, duty of care, breach, psychiatric harm, causation, defences, vicarious liability, trespass to the person, intention infliction of harm or distress, protection from harssassment act, private nuisance and Rylands...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 121  pages

  • October 9, 2022
  • 121
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Professor richard goldberg and dr kim bouwer
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Tort Law
Negligence and Vicarious Liability
ESSENTIAL CASES.......................................................................................................................................... 1
LECTURE 1A: INTRODUCTION TO TORT LAW.................................................................................................. 2
LECTURE 1B: INTRODUCTION TO NEGLIGENCE............................................................................................... 6
LECTURES 2 AND 3: DUTY OF CARE.............................................................................................................. 12
LECTURE 4: BREACH.................................................................................................................................... 18
LECTURE 5: PSYCHIATRIC HARM.................................................................................................................. 26
LECTURES 6 AND 7: CAUSATION.................................................................................................................. 34
LECTURE 8: DEFENCES................................................................................................................................. 45
LECTURES 9 AND 10: VICARIOUS LIABILITY................................................................................................... 51
LECTURE 11: TRESPASS TO THE PERSON: BATTERY AND ASSAULT................................................................61
LECTURE 12: TRESPASS TO THE PERSON: FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND DEFENCES.........................................64
LECTURE 13: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF HARM OR DISTRESS & PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT. . .66
LECTURES 14-16: PRIVATE NUISANCE AND RYLANDS...................................................................................70
LECTURE 15: NUISANCE............................................................................................................................... 80
LECTURE 12: LAND TORTS RYLAND V FLETCHER........................................................................................... 87
LECTURE 13: WHAT IS DEFAMATION?.......................................................................................................... 91
LECTURE 14: DEFAMATION, REFERENCE TO THE PUBLICATION & DEFENCE OF TRUTH................................111
LECTURE 15: DEFAMATION, DEFENCES CONCLUDED..................................................................................115

Essential Cases
1. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
2. Meadows v Khan [2021] UKSC 21, [2021] 3 WLR 147, [28]
3. Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
4. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4
5. Darnley V Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50
6. Marc Rich & Co AG v Bishop Rock Marine Co Ltd, The Nicholas H [1996] AC 211
7. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, [2015] AC 1430
8. Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850
9. The Wagon Mound (no. 2) (Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co Pty) [1967] 1
AC 617
10. Orchard v Lee [2009] EWCA Civ 295
11. Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
12. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582
13. Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232
14. Page v Smith [1996] AC 155
15. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992] 1 AC 310
16. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999] 2 AC 455
17. Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital [1969] 1 QB 428
18. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1

,19. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22; [2003] 1 AC 32
20. Barker v Corus plc [2006] UKHL 20; [206] 2 AC 572
21. Compensation Act 2006, s 3
22. Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd [2011] UKSC 10; 2 WLR 523
23. Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority [1987] AC 50
24. Gregg v Scott [2005] UKHL 2; [2005] 2 AC 176
25. The Wagon Mound (no. 1) (Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd)
[1961] AC 388
26. Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837
27. Jolley v Sutton London BC [2000] 3 All ER 409
28. Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd [1962] 2 QB 405
29. McKew v Holland & Hannan & Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd [1969] 3 All ER 1621
30. Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608
31. Froom v Butcher [1976] QB 286
32. Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
33. Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] 1 AC 1339
34. Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42
35. Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UK SC 10, [2016] AC 660
36. Barclays Bank v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13, [2020] AC 973, [24]
37. Maga v Birmingham Roman Catholic Archdiocese Trustees [2010] EWCA Civ 256
38. Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56
39. Mohamud v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11
40. Morrisons v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12; [2020] AC 989

Lecture 1A: Introduction to Tort Law
What is Tort Law?

 ‘Tort is that branch of the civil law relating to obligations impose by the operation of law on
all natural and artificial persons. It concerns the basic duties one person owes to another
whether he likes it or not’ (Street on Torts).
 ‘A system of precepts about how people may, ought and ought not to behave in their
dealings with others’ (Cane, Atiyah’s Accidents, Compensation and the Law, p 13).

The law of civil wrongs

Tort law is concerned with behaviour legally classified as wrong or tortious. The law provides a
remedy to a civil wrong.

The law of obligations

Obligations are the requirements that one acts (or refrain from acting) in a certain way. Much of the
law is concerned with directing conduct in this way - notably criminal law - cf public and private law.
Tort law is concerned with obligations between individuals (PRIVATE not public law which concerns a
relationship with the state).

When does the law impose obligations on us?

, 1. We owe obligations when going about our daily lives to respect other’s interests
2. Where we breach these obligations, the law imposes duties on us to reverse the
consequences of the breach

Examples
 Defamation – reputation
 Nuisance – enjoyment of land
 Assault concerns physical body
 Physical injury

Primary obligations
Primary obligations when going about daily lives to protect others – body itegreity, mental health,
property. Breach = tort law and criinal law. Law imposes on us duties to reverse the consequences of
the breach – through compensation (loss) and restittuon (giving up the gains made).

Secondary obligations

There are many torts – 70/80 ish

What interests does tort law protect?

INTEREST TORT
Personal (both physical and mental) integrity Negligence
including the right to self- determination Occupiers’ liability
Employers’ liability
Product liability
Trespass to the person (assault, battery, false
imprisonment)
The rule in Wilkinson v Downton
An action under the Protection from Harassment Act
1997
Nuisance (public)
Damage to Property Negligence
Occupiers’ liability
Product liability
Employers’ liability
Trespass to land
Nuisance (public and private) The rule in Rylands v
Fletcher
Financial loss (pure and consequential) Negligence
Product liability
Defamation (libel and slander) Nuisance (public and
private)
Possession, use and Enjoyment of Land Trespass to land
Nuisance (public and private) The rule in Rylands v
Fletcher Negligence
Claims under the Protection from Harassment Act
1997
Reputation Defamation (libel and slander)

, Breach of Confidence
Privacy Negligence
Trespass to land
Nuisance (public and private) Breach of Confidence
‘Tort’ of Invasion of Privacy Claims under the
Protection from Harassment Act 1997

There are three difficulties with this:

1. Appearance of non-existent neatness (eg negligence)
a. While some torts protect specific types of interests, others are much more general
and, as such, protect a number of interests.
b. Protected interests can be defined in very broad terms. Jenny Steele uses the
example of ‘property interests’:

‘Property interests of different sorts are protected against invasion of different types by
various torts. So negligence protects against damage to property; private nuisance overlaps
with negligence but more broadly protects against interference with use and enjoyment of
land [and]; trespass to land protects against interference with possession of land and need
not involve any diminution in value at all’ p.
􏰎 􏰁􏰑􏰒

2. Not all interferences with an individual’s interests are recognised(e.g. where a tortious
ability is thought to be unreliable) see,
􏰎 eg, McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [2000])
3. No general principle as to when particular conduct will or will not give rise to liability in tort
– not in itself enough to provide a remedy (compensation)

The disparate aims of tort law

Tort law has both backward- and forward- looking elements. It looks backward at what happened 􏰀
the ‘wrong’ 􏰀 and addresses the harm done, while also looking to the future and at ways of regulating
behaviour and developing a response to the risk of harm. It seeks to protect an individual’s interests
both prospectively, that is to prevent or deter harm and retrospectively through the provision of
compensation and the distribution of losses. Thus, tort law has a number of disparate functions or
purposes 􏰀 typically identified under the following headings:

 (corrective)justice
 Compensation
 Deterrence
 Inquiry and/or publicity.

(Corrective) Justice

Tort law here is about establishing and applying appropriate principles of justice as to whether
someone should be required to correct for their wrongs: ‘to define cases in which the law may justly
hold one party liable to compensate another’ Lord
􏰎 Bingham, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services
[2002] UKHL 22).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller legalwarrior1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart