100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
2022 OCTOBER EXAM - LAW OF EVIDENCE (LEV3701) $5.82   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

2022 OCTOBER EXAM - LAW OF EVIDENCE (LEV3701)

5 reviews
 54 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Question 1 What must the court in a civil case do if a legal question about the cross-examination of a witness arises and there is no express provision in any South African legislation on the specific issue? Fully explain with reference to a definition. [5] Question 2 Lucky is on trial for the m...

[Show more]
Last document update: 2 year ago

Preview 3 out of 13  pages

  • October 13, 2022
  • October 13, 2022
  • 13
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown

5  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: Sinthle6 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mangenarenice • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: noxville • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: Lelana32 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: Thandiswe63 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
LAW OF
EVIDENCE
LEV3701




UNISA

EXAM SOLUTIONS

13 October 2022

, ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION

1. I understand what academic dishonesty entails and am aware of Unisa’s
policies in this regard.

2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I have used
someone else’s work, I have indicated this by using the prescribed style of
referencing. Every contribution to, and quotation in, this assignment from the
work or works of other people has been referenced according to the
prescribed style.

3. I have not allowed, and will not allow anyone to copy my work with the
intention of passing it off as his or her own work.

4. I did not make use of another student’s work and submit it as my own.

NAME: ……………………………………………………………………………………...

SIGNATURE: ……………………………………………………………………………...

STUDENT NUMBER: ……………………………………………………………………..

MODULE CODE: ...............................................................................................

DATE: ……………………………………………………………………………………....

MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: …………………………………………..

MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: …………………………………………..

, Question 1


What must the court in a civil case do if a legal question about the cross-
examination of a witness arises and there is no express provision in any South
African legislation on the specific issue? Fully explain with reference to a
definition. [5]


A residuary clause determines that foreign law has to be followed on topics for which no
express local statutory provision had been made (Indirect incorporation). These are those
sections in South African statutes which incorporate foreign law into South African law and
thereby preserve that part of foreign law. The general rule in a Civil Matter is that the
evidence is usually inadmissible – this rule is based on the relevancy principle. Generally:
only evidence of general reputation is relevant for the purposes of the law of evidence.


Question 2
Lucky is on trial for the murder of his wife. The prosecution claims that Lucky
committed the murder by poisoning his wife with arsenic. Lucky’s defence is that
his wife committed suicide. Innocent, an attorney, is called by the prosecution to
testify that the accused approached him in his professional capacity for legal
advice and, during their discussions, admitted to having killed his wife. Innocent
subsequently declined to represent Lucky. The prosecution states that this
evidence will be admissible because Lucky had told Innocent of a crime that had
already been completed. Do you agree? Fully discuss with reference to the
requirements for the admissibility of this type of evidence. [10]


I do not agree as the evidence will be inadmissible because the communication was
privileged.


Before legal professional privilege will apply, the following requirements must be met:


1. The legal adviser must act in a professional capacity


This is a question of fact and a strong indication would be the payment of a fee, although the
absence of such would not necessarily be conclusive evidence of the opposite. The grounds
for following the approach of the English courts were set out in Mohamed v President of the
Republic of South Africa 2001 2 SA 1145 (C) in that salaried legal advisers (e.g. those

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyAssistant036. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82191 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.82  3x  sold
  • (5)
  Add to cart