100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary, article by Mommaas (2008) The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere $3.22   Add to cart

Summary

Summary, article by Mommaas (2008) The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere

1 review
 316 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the article by Mommaas (2008): The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere.

Preview 1 out of 6  pages

  • February 8, 2016
  • 6
  • 2015/2016
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: chaz12 • 6 year ago

avatar-seller
Summary: The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public
sphere – H. Mommas (2008)

From the end of the 19th century all over Europe leisure became organized as a
public good. However the current globalization, commercialisation and
integration of the world of leisure is primarily regarded as a threat; it lowers both
the social and cultural quality of public life. This stimulated a defensive attitude
towards the popular, commercial, technological culture. However in context of
the current ‘informational’ or ‘creative’ turn in western economies, this defensive
attitude is becoming problematic.

Themes on the move
The historical context of leisure is changing: the theme leisure in on the move.
‘Leisure’ and the ‘leisure industries’ are both rapidly becoming a part of policy
and management ‘faddism’ in major parts of Europe. From the late 1980’s
onwards both concepts reflect the rapid expansion of a new, more commercially
operating, leisure economy. From the perspective of ‘continental Europe’ notions
of ‘leisure’ are problematic.

First of all: the concept of leisure as such. The current universalisation of more
commercial notions of leisure ignores the wider philosophical, social and political
diversity of concepts of leisure, as well it ignores the commercial elements in the
history of the continental field of ‘free time’. From time onwards, free time was
spent at privately financed fairs, festivals, cafes etc.
Secondly, there is the addition of ‘industries’. In most European languages
‘industry’ evokes connotations of industrial plants and labour, related to coal and
steal. Therefore some introduce concepts as ‘leisure economy’, but this
neutralisation of ‘industry’ actually denies a more critical perspective. For them,
‘leisure industries’ should actually be ‘cultural industries’, which indicates the
manner in which the 20th century art was being reduced to an object of economic
rationality and mass industries. To conclude: the meaning of ‘leisure industries’
has become more ambiguous.

Nowadays there is a movement away from welfare and public service oriented
notions of leisure, towards more commercial, entertainment-oriented concepts of
leisure. This includes three, partly overlapping, transformations, which lead to a
further de-traditionalisation of existing forms of culture and free time.
1. A change in the status of leisure: from a public good, organized for the
civilising benefits of citizens, to a private commodity, to be exchanged on a
market for presumed sovereign consumers.
2. Market- and technology driven forms of de- and re-classification within the
leisure field itself, towards a more ‘horizontal’, integrative and ‘demand’
oriented approach.
3. An opening up of the national leisure field through the liberalisation and
expansion of media, tourism and leisure markets.
 Together these developments are changing the state of the art of public leisure
provision, and the subsequent role for public intervention.

Leisure and the public sphere
To have a good perspective, it is necessary to take a look at the historical role
ascribed to leisure. Roughly abstracting from regional differences, one can depict
a history in which the developing nation states became increasingly involved in
the support and organisation of leisure facilities. Notion of leisure (free time)
became almost synonymous with public leisure. The involvement of the state was

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jannahollema. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.22  2x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart