100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Rules on State Immunity Acts for Torture Being Developed (Law Dissertation) $67.44
Add to cart

Essay

Rules on State Immunity Acts for Torture Being Developed (Law Dissertation)

 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This document contains the rule of state immunity, UK Convention on Jurisdiction immunities of states and Their Property, Defining Jus cogens and the formulation and Right to a remedy

Preview 4 out of 58  pages

  • October 14, 2022
  • 58
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
LLB Dissertation 2018/2019




Critically discuss how, if at all, the international rules on state immunity acts for torture

have developed since the case of Al-Adsani.




Word count: 16,768




1

,Table of contents


Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4


Introduction ...........................................................................................................................5


Chapter 1 –State immunity........................................................................................................


1.1The rule of state immunity....................................................................................................11


1.2.UN Convention on Jurisdiction immunities of States and Their Property 2004 – what it is and

the issue with it....................................................................................................................................13


1.3 State Immunity in the UK......................................................................................................15


1.4. Conclusion............................................................................................................................16


Chapter 2–.State Immunity in the UK and Human Rights/ECHR rejection of the trumping argument.

2.1 Definition of Jus cogens and the formulation…………………………………………………………..……….17

2.2 Is there a normative hierarchy of jus cogens norms.............................................................19


2.3 The trumping effect of jus cogens on state immunity...........................................................20


2.4. Conclusion.............................................................................................................................32


Chapter 3 – A change of direction regarding state immunity


3.1: Introduction.......................................................................................................................34


3.2 Right to a remedy........................................................................................................................36


3.3.Could immunity mean impunity?.................................................................................................41


3.4 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 47


Chapter 4 – Conclusion…………………………………..………………………………………………………………48

2

,Bibliography…..................................................................................................................49




Abstract



3

, This dissertation considers whether the international rules on state immunity acts for

torture have developed since the case of Al-Adsani v. The United Kingdom, [2001] 1. Firstly, it

is submitted that there has been no development on the law of state immunity since the

trumping argument is rejected several times. It is argued that the trumping argument should

be upheld rather than rejected because of the concept of human rights and that people

should have a right to a remedy. Secondly, article 6 ECHR could be used as a way of

removing immunity as article 6 trumps immunity. An example of this was shown in the case

of Benkharbouche & Anor v Foreign & Commonwealth Office [2017].2 Therefore, this would

more likely to increase the chance of the victim to be provided a remedy and achieve

justice.




Introduction

1
Al-Adsani v. The United Kingdom, [2001] ECHR 752 application 35763/97
2
Benkharbouche & Anor v Foreign & Commonwealth Office [2017] UKSC 62

4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller johnatkinson. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $67.44. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$67.44
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added