This essay can be helpful for your CIE A levels, AS level exams or even first year law degree. All my essays have been marked by my lecturer and given good grades! This essay was awarded top in the class marks (English legal system)
Selection and role of Judges
‘Consider critically’ = Compare old & new appointment + Judges in other countries
*types of questions:
● Appointment
● Training
Role of Judges
Judges are expected to deliver judgements in a completely impartial manner, applying the law
strictly, without allowing personal preferences to affect their decision under the rule of law.
Judges play a vital but sensitive role in controlling the exercise of power by the state. The
passing of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) significantly increased the power of judges to
control the work of Parliament and the executive.
Judicial hierarchy
Judges are at the centre of any legal system as they sit in court and decide cases. The Head of
the judiciary is the president of the Courts of England and Wales. This position was created by
the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Under s.7 of the Act, the President’s role is to represent the
views of the judiciary to Parliament and Government Minister.
—————————————————————————————————————
*Appointment / Selection / recruitment to the Judiciary
Old appt:
The Lord Chancellor played a central role in the appointment of the judges prior to the 2005 Act.
The Lords of Appeal in Ordinary and the Lords Justices of Appeal were appointed by the Queen
on the advice of the Prime Minister, who was advised by the Lord Chancellor. High Court
judges, circuit judges and recorders were appointed by the Queen on advice of the Lord
Chancellor. This system can only achieve limited results because the Lord Chancellor has sole
responsibility for the appointment process. However, this old system no longer commands
public confidence, and is increasingly hard to reconcile with the demands of the HRA.
New appt:
Following a limited consultation process, the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was passed
through the consultation paper which considered the creation of three possible types of
commissions: an Appointing Commission which would itself decide whom to appoint, a
Recommending Commission which would make suggestions to a minister on who to appoint
and a Hybrid Commission which would act as an appointing commission for junior appointments
and as a recommending commission for senior appointments. The creation of a Judicial
Appointments Commission (JAC) was to stop breaches of principles of the separation of power
and reinforce judicial independence.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Pr3rn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
