100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Copyright Law Problem Essay $4.99   Add to cart

Essay

Copyright Law Problem Essay

 15 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A problem essay on copyright question.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • October 22, 2022
  • 4
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
1. A lecturer in classical music at Aberystwyth University, works on the
incomplete and unfinished music scores of a 18thcentury composer. The
lecturer produces performing editions of the music, which can be performed
by an orchestra. Does copyright subsist in modern performing editions of out-
of-copyright music? Use case law to illustrate your answer.

Answer

This essay seeks to deal with the issue on whether or not the performing editions of
the music produced by the lecturer is capable of being protected by copyright.

In the current case, it is not disputable that the work in issue falls under the category
of musical works. Stated under section 1 of the CDPA 1988. In order for the musical
work to be protected under copyright law, four requirements must be satisfied:

1) Fixation

2) Originality

3) Connection

4) Public policy requirement

In the current case, there would be no issue for the requirements of fixation,
connection and public policy to be established. As it would be safe to infer that the
work in issue (the performing editions) is in a material form as it would be impossible
to perform an orchestra without a physical piece, and that the work shares a
connection with United Kingdom as the work was done in Aberystwyth University. In
relation to the public policy requirement, there would be no issue for the work to
qualify as it does not fall under the category of works which is illegal, immoral or
indecent as illustrated in Glyn v Western Film Feature and AG v Guardian (No.2).

In establishing the requirement of originality, the case of Ladbroke v William Hill
states that it must be shown that labour, skill and judgement were involved in the
making of the work. Furthermore, in dealing with cases which involves reworking of
an old piece of work, cases of Christoffer v Poseidon Film and Sawkins v Hyperion
Records Ltd affirmed that the reworking by a modern author of an old work would not
prevent the new work from being ‘original’ which falls under the CDPA 1988 if
necessary involvement of labour, skill and judgement were illustrated.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ylfongylfong. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart