100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Essay plan on misrepresentation $7.99   Add to cart

Essay

Essay plan on misrepresentation

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

An essay plan on problem essay on the issue of misrepresentation

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • October 26, 2022
  • 6
  • 2019/2020
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
1. Introduction

1.1. The purpose of this essay is to advice Dennis on whether the statements made by Ratner

were misrepresentation. And if they were in fact misrepresentation, what type of

misrepresentation were they and the possible remedies Dennis might be entitled to. In

doing so, few issues are required to be dealt with.

1.1.1. The first issue is whether the representation could amount to an actionable

misrepresentation; if yes

1.1.2. Then it is required to identify the type of misrepresentation; and

1.1.3. Lastly the possible remedies which Dennis might be entitled to.

2. In dealing with the first issue on whether the representation made by Ratner could amount to

an actionable misrepresentation.

2.1. Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made by the representor to the representee

which induces the representee to enter into the contract. the effect of an actionable

misrepresentation makes the contract voidable, giving the innocent party the right to

rescind the contract and/ or claim damages. In establishing an actionable

misrepresentation, three elements must be proven:

2.1.1. The representation must be an untrue statement of fact;

2.1.2. The representation must be induced the representee to enter into the contract; and

2.1.3. The representation must be relied by the representee.

2.2. In dealing with the first element of untrue statement of fact, the case of Bisset v

Wilkinson provides that there must be a false statement of fact or law, the statement

must not be of an opinion or estimation of future events. However in Smith v Land and

House Property Corp an exception was provided for the general rule which states that a

, statement of opinion can be regarded as statement of facts if it contradicts with other

facts already known by the representor. In addition, the case of Esso Petroleum v

Mardon too provides for the exception for the general which states that statement made

as to estimation of future could amount to misrepresentation if the representor had

knowledge and expertise. In addition, in terms of the factor of silence, the general rule of

silence is that it does not amount to misrepresentation this rule was made clear in Smith

v Hughes. However the case of With v O’ Flanagan an exception was provided which

states that statements which later become false due to later changes of circumstances can

amount to misrepresentation if the representor had failed his obligation to disclose the

change of circumstances.

2.2.1. On the facts, two statements were made. In relation to the first statement which

Ratner stated that the firm has made a hefty profit of 35000 pounds, while in fact the

firm’s net annual profit had never exceeded 10000 pounds, therefore the first

statement made by Ratner was an untrue statement of fact. In addition, as a director

of the firm, Ratner would have known about the false nature of the statement while

he stated that the firm has made a profit of 35000 pounds.

2.2.2. In relation to the second statement which Ratner foresees that the firm has great

potential for future expansion in the locality, which later became untrue due to the

failure to disclose that the fact that a third party competitor had opened up in the

vicinity of Ratner and Co. This statement is a statement of estimation of future

which according to the general rule, it will not amount to misrepresentation.

However Ratner, as a director of the frim, it is assumed that he had the expertise and

has made proper considerations on all relevant circumstances before making the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ylfongylfong. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart