100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE $10.49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE

1 beoordeling
 148 keer bekeken  2 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE.Summarize the facts of the case OpenPeak, Inc. were in the process of producing a computer tablet product for a client and during the production, placed a purchase order for embedded wireless data from Optio...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 5  pagina's

  • 3 november 2022
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: kesheida • 4 maanden geleden

avatar-seller
Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc. 1


C12 - Business Law

Case Analysis 1



Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc.



Summarize the facts of the case

OpenPeak, Inc. were in the process of producing a computer tablet product for a client and

during the production, placed a purchase order for embedded wireless data from Option Wireless, Ltd.

The purchase order was to include details for the 12,300 units to be purchased at the price of USD

$848,700. Both the Buyer and Seller settled on the how many shipments the order would arrive in initially

and concluded the exact number of units and price that would be included in the final shipment,

dependent on a deposit which would be paid in full for the remaining balance. The buyer’s invoice

contained terms on this arrangement and, in addition, also contained a clause stating the buyer had a

maximum of fourteen days to contest any area of the invoice as they see fit. The contract also stated that

if this term was not complied with, the seller would not carry any responsibility for any damages incurred.

Once the remaining balance was paid, the final shipment was sent however upon inspection of the units,

the buyer concluded that the shipment contained multiple defects as they did not meet the specifications

previously agreed upon. In light of this, the Buyer formally rejected the shipment and returned the

defective modules approximately three months later. The seller requested that data be provided from the

buyer to prove there was no such deficiency. Even though the buyer complied, the seller has not provided

proof that there were no defects. The Buyer would like the seller to be charged a total of four criminal

counts, three of which including counts as contractual breach and the fourth count to include unjust

enrichment. The Seller moved to dismiss all contractual breach charges however motion to dismiss was

denied in favor of the buyer.

, Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc. 2




Identify the parties and explain each party’s position


OpenPeak, Inc. is identified as the Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Buyer whereas Option

Wireless, Ltd is identified as the Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Seller. The Defendant’s position in

the case is to receive compensation for direct as well as consequential damages regarding the order

that was placed and delivered with defective units. The defendant claims there was a breach of

contract. The Plaintiff’s position is that the buyer did not comply with the terms listed on the

purchase order which gives a time restraint on the return of units that were unsatisfactory.




Outline the case’s procedural history including any appeals


The case was brought to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Option Wireless, Ltd filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim of OpenPeak, Inc. A decision by the

court was made to deny this request. There are no appeals on records regarding this decision.




What is the legal issue in question in this case?


The legal issue in question in this case is if an invoice produced by the seller is

considered as a proper means of accepting the offer set out by the buyer, by way of a

purchase order, in the event that the invoice specifically discloses a restriction on how

significantly damaged goods are recovered but the purchase order did not. If there is in fact a

contract that has been executed, where is the location of the terms placed within the contract.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√  	Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper StudyConnect. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $10.49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79373 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
$10.49  2x  verkocht
  • (1)
  Kopen