I achieved an A* in criminology, with my Unit 3 being graded at 96%. This document includes AC3.2: Just Verdicts, Case study- Stephen Lawrence, Miscarriages of Justice, Case study- Sean Hodgson, Case Study- Stephen Downing, Safe verdicts, Just Sentencing, Case study- Ian paterson, Case Study- Rhys ...
Hi,
Thanks so much for the review! Hope the document is helpful, good luck in your controlled assessment!
By: annamakinson2005 • 1 year ago
By: teiganbryant • 1 year ago
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
Any feedback on how to bump it up from a 4 star to a 5?
The document was written 2022 and received 96% in all but if the layout isn’t easy to understand let me know so I can alter it for others :)
Thank youcfor your purchase!
Seller
Follow
teiganbryant
Reviews received
Content preview
AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information
Just Verdicts
A just verdict is a proper, lawful verdict made based on the facts in the case. An unjust
verdict is a verdict considered to be unfair or not morally correct, this can happen in cases
where evidence was fabricated, concealed or exaggerated.
Stephen Lawrence
Stephen Lawrence was an 18 year old from London who fell victim to a racially motivated
knife crime causing his death. The day after his murder, an anonomyus letter was left with
the names of the 4 white youths who killed Lawrence, the police began surveilling them. The
three witnesses who saw the murder take place described it as quick and brutal. After a
press conference from Lawrence’s parents put pressure on the police to quicken the
investigation, the suspects were arrested but only two were charged but denied the charges.
Shortly after this, the CPS dropped the case based on ‘unreliable evidence’ as none of the 3
witnesses could identify the murderers as well as the ID evidence provided by Dwayne
brookes being deemed unreliable. An internal review was opened into the police and CPS
handling of the case and Lawrence’s parents pursued private prosecution of the suspects.
Charges for Jamie Acourt and David Norris were dropped before the trial due to ‘insufficient
evidence’ whereas the other three were aquitted of murder by a jury in criminal court, the
verdict was awarded after justice Curtis deemed Dwayne Brookes to be unreliable and
denied his legitimacy as a witness. Proper legal action was finally taken over a decade later
in 2011 which sent two of the murderers to jail, a minimum of 15 years and 2 months for
Dobson and 14 years and 3 months for Norris. The pair tried to appeal their conviction and
were shut down; it was announced in 2013 that Dobson had completely dropped his appeal.
The amount of time it took to achieve justice is definitely unjust, as well as the fact that not
all the murderers were sentenced however, the right verdict was given to those who were
sentenced.
Miscarriages of Justice
A miscarriage of justice is a wrong and unjust decision made in a criminal or civil court which
sees the guilty go free and the innocent sentenced. The opposite of a miscarriage is when
the just and correct verdict is given in a case.
Case Study- Sean Hodgson
Sean Hodgson was accused and sentenced for the murder of Teresa De Simone in 1979. A
3 year police investigation led to Hodgsons arrest. Hodgson's record for dishonest offences
and his compulsive lying which led him to confess to crimes he had not committed made him
a perfect scapegoat for the police. Hodgson was sentenced to life imprisonment by a
unanimous jury verdict. After DNA evidence developed, police launched Operation Iceberg
which led them to David Lace. Lace had confessed to the murder when in custody for an
unrelated offence however police did nothing with this information as they believed the right
man was already serving time for the murder. After 27 years Sean Hodgson was released
from prison in one of the biggest miscarriage of justice cases in the UK. Hodgson was only
awarded £46 compensation to restart his life with, amounting to only £1.70 for each year he
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller teiganbryant. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
