100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
summary all lectures cpt23306 $5.78
Add to cart

Summary

summary all lectures cpt23306

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a comprehensive summary of all lectures. The summary includes photos from the powerpoint.

Preview 4 out of 38  pages

  • November 23, 2022
  • 38
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Persuasion in consumer communication for sustainability
Lecture 1: introduction

4th centurary BC Aristotle: three things to make communication persuasive
1. Logos:
Logical arguments: message
2. Pathos
Emotional appeals: audience
3. Ethos
Good character of the speaker: communicator

Mid 20th century Cialdini: six” weapons" of influence


Persuasion: a definition
“Persuasion as a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people to
change their own attitudes or behaviors regarding an issue through the transmission of a
message in an atmosphere of free choice” Perloff, 2020

Relies on symbols: words, signs, images
Involves an attempt to influence: deliberative, intentional, conscious
Entails self-persuasion: persuadee make the change
Requires transmission of message: arguments, cues
Assumes free choice: option to do not follow persuader

Buckle up, it’s the law  persuasion
Don’t be bananas!  persuasion
Monsters were fake, no movies was good because good acting  persuasion

Persuasion:
1. Friend’s attempt to influence another’s opinion of movies
2. Loves one’s antidrug appeal
3. Advertising
4. Health public service message
5. Political campaigns
6. Sales and telemarketing

Coercion:
1. Threatening messages
2. Employer’s directives
3. Interrogation
4. Communication on dangerously abusive relationships
5. Ban on smoking
6. Enforcement of seat belt laws

,Persuasion vs propaganda/manipulation
 Persuasion differs from propaganda “in its aims, in the means it uses, in the pressure
it exerts, and in the range of people it affects” Mulholland, 2003
 Three common features of propaganda:
o Control over the transmission of information
o Is directed towards masses of individuals
o And uses covert messages that disguise the true intent = manipulation
 “Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate
cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent
of the propagandist”

Perspectives on persuasion
 Persuasion is ubiquitous in contemporary life
 Self-persuasion is central: we convince and change ourselves in response to
persuasion;
 Two very different ways people frequently process persuasive information: one
effortful, the other more automatic (dual processing);
 Adopting an ethical approach to persuasion is crucial, particularly in an era of ever-
subtle technological tricks.
 Ideas and concepts shade into each other: grey zones!

,Lecture 2: Rational deliberation

The problem
We learn to use communication in an instrumental way in different roles:
 Systematic distortion of communication
 Spaces for understanding and deliberation needed

How do we create spaces for rational deliberation?

Rational deliberation: Habermas
Some assumptions:
 All people possess rationality
 All people are free and equal
 All people need to have a say in issues that affect them
 All decisions can be made in a consensual and rational way
 influential in research on “deliberative democracy”

some features of “ideal speech situations”
 Goal: “Communicative action” – reaching consensus
 Procedural rules: no coercion; equality, inclusiveness
 Logical rules: No contradictions, onconsistencies, or equivocations (using same words
with different meanings)
 Presuppositions to agree on “validity”
o Sincerity (e.g. the speaker’s authenticity, seriousness, honest; non deceptive
intent)
o Truth (e.g. a fact, an objective finding)
o Rightness (e.g. moral rules and principles)

Types of discourses
What are different types of discourses that are used in deliberation
 Explicative discourse
o Is it clear and understandable?
 Theoretical discourse
o Is it true? Is it effective?
 Practical discourse
o Is it relevant and justified?

Validity claims and controversies
What are different types of issues and claims that need to be clarified?
 Physical clarity  explicative discourse
o Is the communication accessible?
 Syntactic clarity  Explicative discourse
o Is the format understandable?
 Semantic clarity  Explicative discourse
o Is the content understandable
 Relevance  practical discourse

, o Is the content relevant?
 Expressive validity
o Do we really mean what we say?
 Empirical validity  theoretical discourse
o Is it true/fact-based what we say?
 Normative validity  Practical discourse
o Is it appropriate to say it?
 Instrumental rationality  Theoretical discourse
o Do we say it efficiently?
 Strategic rationality  theoretical discourse
o Does what we say achieve effects?
 Aesthetic rationality
o Is how we say it aesthetic?
 Communicative rationality
o Can everyone with what we are saying?
It is a staircase for reflective practice, but it is not linear.


EX. Sustainability meta labeling  deliberating what a more general sustainability label
should include
 Physical clarity  I think that the definitions of the criteria and the measurement
procedures should be publicly available!
 Syntactic clarity  Should a global sustainable label use metric or imperial
measurements?
Habermas rational deliberation:
 Strengths
o Provides procedures and principles for rational deliberation
o Orientation towards consensus reflects/supports democratic processes
o Ensures equality, freedom and reasoned action
o Procedural, but not relativistic (norms need to be agreed on, e.g. what counts
as truth)
 Limitations/critique
o Idealistic: conditions for ideal speech are rarely, if ever, met
o Assumes (in principle) informed, willing, and competent participants and
ignores human biases
o Western-/Eurocentric

Rhetorics
Aristotle:
 Logos
 Pathos
 Ethos
Later (middle ages and during enlightenment), rhetoric focused on rigorous logical structure
and rational persuasion

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller juliem50549. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

48756 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$5.78
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added