With the dramatic growth of new media in contemporary society, social media platforms have been
created and are wildly used in the world. Since the Chinese government banned Twitter, Facebook,
Tumblr and other social media in Mainland China, some Chinese companies produced similar apps or
websites as substitutions. In China, Weibo can be regarded as Chinse Twitter; Tencent QQ can
substitute Facebook; and "Lofter (http://www.lofter.com/), established in 2011, is similar in form to
Tumblr, and has become the most popular platform in the PRC for fans to create and consume fan
fiction and fan art" (Ng and Li 491). Feng and Literate (2587) also named it a "blogging community".
Many fans utilise this App as a platform to find people who have the same interests (like the same
celebrity, fascinated in a movie or book, Etc.) with them. By doing this, they can follow certain tags;
post paintings, fan fictions and fanvids; and also comment and give likes. Users are "creating content
and sharing with others who have some social connections with them" (Yan et al. 81). Therefore, Lofter
involves highly user-generated contents. While Lofter made lots of activities available for fans, it also
continuously takes down particular posts and annoyed many content creators. It indicated that media
surveillance also exists among this platform which constrains users from sharing information. This
essay will provide more in-depth analysis by applying two theories, affordances and surveillance, to
2
, this example.
Aspects of understanding affordances of Lofter
The original definition of affordance was raised by Gibson, which connects to ecological psychology.
David and Chouinard stated that it refers to what the environment "offers to animal, what it provides
or furnishes, either for good or ill" (241). In other words, affordances are what animals can do in a
particular environment. Later on, the concept of affordance has been divided into several different
aspects, including conceptualising affordances, perceived affordances, technology affordances, and so
on (Bucher and Helmond).
This essay will focus on a general meaning of affordance, which according to Davis and Chouinard,
"affordance refers to the range of functions and constraints that an object provides for, and places upon,
structurally situated subjects" (241). It allows a specific type of interaction between people and objects
and leads people to a certain kind of communication. The authors also suggested three conditions of
affordances, which are "perception, dexterity and cultural and institutional legitimacy" (245).
Perception refers to whether a person knows that the affordance of an object or artefact exits or not.
Davis and Chouinard claimed that the functions or features of an artefact are only available when a
3
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jingyiwu. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.