100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Final Essay for New Media Theory (grade in 8.6) $5.97   Add to cart

Essay

Final Essay for New Media Theory (grade in 8.6)

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The essay used affordances as the main theory, coping with surveillance and panopticon, to analyse a platform.

Preview 3 out of 16  pages

  • December 6, 2022
  • 16
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 8-9
avatar-seller
How can we understand Lofter from the perspective of affordances and surveillances?




Abstract


This essay will focus on Lofter, a social media in China. By explaining the exact function and feature


of Lofter, theory of affordances will be applied to help with the analysis of what are the affordance of


App. Also, it will descibe under what circumstances can people use the affordances of the platform


based on Davis and Chouinard’s article, Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. In the


second part, how Lofter can control over its users will be discussed. This control will be separated


into surveillance (related to panopticon), and how algorithms can help with a softer control


(continuously changing with the change of users’ behaviour).


Keywords: Lofter, Affordances, Surveillance, Panopticon




1

,Introduction


With the dramatic growth of new media in contemporary society, social media platforms have been


created and are wildly used in the world. Since the Chinese government banned Twitter, Facebook,


Tumblr and other social media in Mainland China, some Chinese companies produced similar apps or


websites as substitutions. In China, Weibo can be regarded as Chinse Twitter; Tencent QQ can


substitute Facebook; and "Lofter (http://www.lofter.com/), established in 2011, is similar in form to


Tumblr, and has become the most popular platform in the PRC for fans to create and consume fan


fiction and fan art" (Ng and Li 491). Feng and Literate (2587) also named it a "blogging community".


Many fans utilise this App as a platform to find people who have the same interests (like the same


celebrity, fascinated in a movie or book, Etc.) with them. By doing this, they can follow certain tags;


post paintings, fan fictions and fanvids; and also comment and give likes. Users are "creating content


and sharing with others who have some social connections with them" (Yan et al. 81). Therefore, Lofter


involves highly user-generated contents. While Lofter made lots of activities available for fans, it also


continuously takes down particular posts and annoyed many content creators. It indicated that media


surveillance also exists among this platform which constrains users from sharing information. This


essay will provide more in-depth analysis by applying two theories, affordances and surveillance, to



2

, this example.




Aspects of understanding affordances of Lofter


The original definition of affordance was raised by Gibson, which connects to ecological psychology.


David and Chouinard stated that it refers to what the environment "offers to animal, what it provides


or furnishes, either for good or ill" (241). In other words, affordances are what animals can do in a


particular environment. Later on, the concept of affordance has been divided into several different


aspects, including conceptualising affordances, perceived affordances, technology affordances, and so


on (Bucher and Helmond).


This essay will focus on a general meaning of affordance, which according to Davis and Chouinard,


"affordance refers to the range of functions and constraints that an object provides for, and places upon,


structurally situated subjects" (241). It allows a specific type of interaction between people and objects


and leads people to a certain kind of communication. The authors also suggested three conditions of


affordances, which are "perception, dexterity and cultural and institutional legitimacy" (245).


Perception refers to whether a person knows that the affordance of an object or artefact exits or not.


Davis and Chouinard claimed that the functions or features of an artefact are only available when a



3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jingyiwu. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.97
  • (0)
  Add to cart