100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Constitutional Law Essay about Dutch constitutional review $5.78
Add to cart

Essay

Constitutional Law Essay about Dutch constitutional review

1 review
 11 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The document is an essay, which I wrote last year about Dutch Constitutional Review for the final essay assignment for Constitutional Law. The essay is an example of writing an excellent essay and it was graded with a 9,2.

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • December 6, 2022
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 9-10

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: maryviennes • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Introduction



This academic paper will discuss the prohibition of constitutional review in the

Netherlands. In the introduction, it will be explained what its basis in the law is, what it

means and what the effects are. Then it will be discussed how questions of constitutionality

of Acts of Parliament are solved in the Dutch constitutional system. Next, the system of

constitutional review in Germany and the United States will be discussed. Lastly, I will give

advice to the Minister of the Interior and of kingdom Relations for an amendment of the

Dutch Constitution.

In this paper, the word ‘law’ means an entire law, or a part thereof, approved by

Parliament and enacted by the administration. The word ‘government’ is used for the

combined three branches of government. The word ‘administration’ means the executive

branch of government in this paper.

First, the basis of the prohibition of constitutional review by courts is Article 120 of

the Dutch Constitution. It states: ‘The constitutionality of Acts of Parliament and treaties

shall not be reviewed by the courts.’ 1 The article means that Acts of Parliament and treaties

cannot be reviewed by courts whatsoever in any instance. Lower legal rules and

government policy, however, can be reviewed against the constitutionality by courts. In

practice, the article means that unconstitutional laws or treaties must be carried out, even

if they conflict with the Constitution. This might seem strange since the Constitution is

higher in the hierarchy of legal rules. Changing the Constitution needs a supermajority in

Parliament of 2/3rd of the parliamentarians, while changing the law only needs half of the

parliamentarians. The idea behind article 120 is that the legislative branch and the

administration are responsible for the interpretation of the Constitution. When there are

different possible interpretations of the Constitution, not the judge, but the legislature and

the administration have the last say.2

1
Grondwet 1815, art 120.
2
Leenknegt and Hirsch Ballin, Korte Uitleg van de Grondwet (Wolters Kluwer 2014) 273; A.D. Belinfante and
others, Beginselen van het Nederlands Staatsrecht (Wolters Kluwer 2015) 215-216; (A.J. Nieuwenhuis and M. den
Heijer and A.W. Hins, Hoofdstukken Grondrechten (Ars Aequi Libri 2017) 53.

, Floris Prins
SNR: 2070985

On top of that, this article has been interpreted quite broadly by Dutch courts. In

1961, the highest court ruled that even the used procedure when the law was passed could

not be reviewed.3 For example, whether there actually was a majority in Parliament when

the chair said so. Another case where the broad interpretation prevailed was a case about

the Statute of the kingdom.4 The Statute is the overarching constitution of the Kingdom of

the Netherlands. The Constitution is only applicable in the European part of the Kingdom.

The statute does not say anything about the possibility of constitutional review. In the

absence of ‘the text of the Statute or the official explanation or the history of its creation’ 5

that unambiguously point out that constitutional review is allowed by courts, the status

quo of no constitutional review by courts must be continued.6




3
HR 27 January 1961, ECLI:NL:HR:1961:AG2059.
4
Statuut voor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 1954.
5
HR 14 April 1989, ECLI:NL:HR:1989:AD5725, para 4.2.
6
HR 14 April 1989, ECLI:NL:HR:1989:AD5725.

1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller florisprins81. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

51662 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$5.78  1x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added