100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AQA A-level Philosophy 12 mark Essay Exemplar: 'Explain Flew’s attack on religious language and Hare’s response' $7.14   Add to cart

Other

AQA A-level Philosophy 12 mark Essay Exemplar: 'Explain Flew’s attack on religious language and Hare’s response'

 178 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

An exemplar essay for the practice 12 mark exam question 'Explain Flew’s attack on religious language and Hare’s response' for AQA A-level philosophy.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • December 12, 2022
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Religious Language- 12 marker

Explain Flew’s attack on religious language and Hare’s response.

Religious language (RL) refers to the motifs, symbolism, and utterances used within religion but
it becomes a conflict between philosophers, as to whether or not there is meaning to such
language. According to Flew there is not, as meaningful statements are ‘falsilisable’- hence the
foundation of his argument is ‘The Falsification Principle’. The falsification principle says that a
statement is meaningful if and only if there are grounds for falsification. In other words, you
know what would have to happen to disprove the statement. For example, claiming that ‘all
swans are white’ cannot be proven true because it is impossible to check every swan. However,
you know that to falsify the claim, you just need to find one non-white swan. Flew considers the
denial of the inverse of a claim to be ‘necessarily equivalent’ to the claim itself. So in this case
the claim ‘all swans are white’ is equivalent to ‘no swans are non-white’. We know that ‘no
swans are non-white’ is false, hence the claim ‘all swans are white’ is false.

Regarding RL, Flew claims there is nothing that could possibly happen that could disprove it.
Taking an example from the problem of evil, we can ask if ‘God loves us like a father loves their
child’, why can people suffer so greatly (e.g. from disease and poverty)? Arguably, the extent of
suffering in the world ought to falsify the perfect nature of God’s love- it does not though. Flew
points out that attempts to falsify God’s nature or existence are met with the theists’ attempt to
further qualify the concept. So instead of admitting God lacks anything, his being becomes
unfalsifiable. Flew illustrates this with a parable:

There are two people who come across an area of flowers and weeds. Whilst one focuses on
the flowers and believes a gardener must tend to it, the other recognises the weeds and
disagrees. They never see or hear a gardener so the believer claims they must be invisible.
After setting up an electric fence, there is still no evidence of a gardener, so the believer also
claims they are insensible and cannot make a sound. The sceptic questions now what remains
of the original assertion because a gardener with all these additional qualities becomes no
different from an imaginary gardener, or no gardener at all.

This garden represents the good and evil in the world and the gardener represents God. With
every apparent ‘failure’, the believer never gives up on their idea of the gardener, only adjusts it.
The definition of God, such as that of the gardener, becomes so qualified that it loses any
meaning. This is what Flew refers to as ‘dying the death of a thousand qualifications’. So since
there is nothing that could possibly happen to disprove God, as well as any RL, RL is
non-propositional and all meaningless.

Hare, on the other hand, believes religious language can be non-propositional (non-cognitive)
and maintain meaning. He presents a parable also- ‘the parable of the killer dons’:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tiawhymark. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.14. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.14
  • (0)
  Add to cart