100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting Aantekeningen levensbeschouwing engels artikel 1) John Schimek, Tolerance and Hospitality. 1e jaar SPH $3.21   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting Aantekeningen levensbeschouwing engels artikel 1) John Schimek, Tolerance and Hospitality. 1e jaar SPH

1 review
 658 views  4 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

In dit bestand staat het artikel 'Tolerance and Hospitality: the key to religious plurality' van John Schimek. Het is een artikel voor het tentamen van levensbeschouwing. Ik heb de (in mijn ogen) belangrijkste aspecten geel gemaakt. Na het artikel volgen nog 2 pagina's aan aantekeningen uit de leve...

[Show more]
Last document update: 8 year ago

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • March 25, 2016
  • March 25, 2016
  • 7
  • 2015/2016
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: selmae • 7 year ago

avatar-seller
Tolerance and Hospitality: The Key to Religious Plurality
John Schimek


The basis for maintaining a peaceful and respectful multicultural society has evaded
many nations
throughout history. Its absence has led to great atrocities including, but not limited
to, genocide and terrorism. Many people point to tolerance as the key for an
appropriately accommodating plural society. After providing a definition for what
tolerance is, this paper analyzes tolerance as a virtue and excluvism’s role in its
execution. It then demonstrates that tolerance is a virtue that falls short of
providing a sustainable peacefully plural society because its determinant lies only in
action and goes on to expand on a more positive virtue that is required for a stable
diverse society–hospitality. This virtue requires mutual recognition, respect and
response rather than the simple indifference that tolerance suggests.
Many view tolerance as a virtue and therefore by Aristotle’s definition, a mean
between extremes (Irwin, 2009). It then follows that there are times to exercise
intolerance (acting against injustice for example) and times to exercise tolerance.
However, in the case of religion, exclusive beliefs complicate the execution of
tolerance because their doctrine may dictate that individuals of a foreign religion
may be excluded from some important spiritual benefits. The solution to this
problem is that strong reactions constitute religious intolerance. “Strong reaction is
when [the action] is based on seeing a man’s religion as relevant to something
which it is not really relevant” (Newman, 1978). Evangelism may be seen as acting
against another religion but it is in an area where religion is relevant and is,
therefore, still religiously tolerant. Areas where religion is never relevant include but
are not limited to the preservation of the other’s life and the pursuit of a more
flourishing life because these are areas that people of any faith (or lack thereof)
pursue – their faith is irrelevant. Any action against these areas based on religion
are strong reactions and therefore intolerant. Tolerance is seen as a mean between
extremes, but religious tolerance does not allow acting against people of other
religions in matters that are not religious in nature. Exclusive beliefs need not
conflict with this definition because a person may believe others are going to Hell

, because of their beliefs and only act against them in matters where religion is
applicable.
There is little debate that virtuously tolerant people better a society. If an entire
population were religiously tolerant, there would be less violence and injustice due
to differences in beliefs, particularly theological beliefs. Religious tolerance is
sufficient for a peaceful and respectful society but maintenance for the long term
becomes difficult when relying solely on tolerance. While tolerance may prevent
violence and injustice, it leaves undisturbed the underlying dynamic that makes
violence possible—prejudice. While discrimination would end, the prejudices may
still exist and this would leave a society very close to the violence that its prejudices
call for but that its tolerance prevents. This is a notable deficiency of religious
tolerance.
Tolerance is simply the “acceptance or endurance of something which one has a
negative attitude towards” (Newman, 1978). The word is derived from the verb “to
tolerate” which implies a certain amount of distaste for the thing tolerated. When
this definition of tolerance is applied to religion, it follows that tolerance is not the
acceptance of another’s belief but an acceptance or endurance of their holding a
belief. This distinction is important in order to maintain the integrity of one’s own
beliefs. Because religious tolerance is simply inaction where religion is not
important, it “does not foreclose the possibility of looking condescendingly, with
loathing and disdain upon the other whom one tolerates” (Conway, 2009). John Doe
may be a religiously tolerant man because he is not acting against people of other
faiths, but he could very well look at every other religion with the idea that they are
far inferior to his own. This idea of presumed superiority is the underlying dynamic
that makes the possibility of discrimination and violence ever present. In order to
achieve a peacefully plural society, one must “view that many different activities
and forms of life which are incompatible are valuable,” – a much more demanding
call (Raz, 2001). The virtue of tolerance does not require one to see any value in
any other style of life, but that one does not act in accord with those prejudices. As
such, it is not the key to a plural society; rather, we must find another more
appropriate virtue to accommodate this need. The virtue that demands one to not
simply tolerate another’s way of life but respect that way of life is hospitality.
The need for hospitality seems to be recognized by Buddhists who call “for a
different ethos… an abode of dwelling that describes a fundamental way of being in

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Chantalcx. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70055 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21  4x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart