Contents
Chapter 8 The Challenge from Sociology of Science ............................................................................... 2
Chapter 9 Feminism and Science Studies................................................................................................ 4
Chapter 10 Naturalistic Philosophy in Theory and Practice .................................................................... 6
Chapter 11 Naturalism and the Social Structure of Science ................................................................... 8
Chapter 12 Scientific Realism ................................................................................................................ 10
Chapter 13 Explanation ......................................................................................................................... 12
Chapter 14 Bayesianism and Modern Theories of Evidence................................................................. 14
Chapter 15 Empiricism, Naturalism, and Scientific Realism? ................................................................ 16
Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 18
By Paul Porteners
Back to Contents
, Chapter 8 The Challenge from Sociology of Science
The founder of sociology of science, and the central figure for many years, was Robert Merton.
Merton isolated what he called the “norms” of science: a set of basic values that govern scientific
communities. These norms are
Universalism: idea that the personal attributes and social background of a person are
irrelevant to the scientific value of the person’s ideas
Communism: common ownership of scientific ideas and results
Disinterestedness: scientists are supposed to act for the benefit of a common scientific
enterprise, rather than personal gain. (made questionable by Merton’s later ideas)
Organized skepticism: community-wide pattern of challenging and testing ideas instead of
taking them on trust. (Kuhn: balance between skepticism and trust, between open-
mindedness and dogmatism)
Merton claimed that the basic currency for scientific reward is recognition, especially recognition for
being the first person to come up with an idea.
Encourage original thinking
Desire for reward results in “deviant” behaviors
o Fraud is rare largely because of a rigorous internal policing by scientists
o Plagiarism does happen
o The most usual outlet is libel and slander of competitors: accusation of plagiarism
Mania to publish. Recognition even in a tiny community of colleagues can be a significant
source of motivation.
Merton’s sociology is often seen as the “old” style of sociology of science, a style that was overruled
nearly thirty years ago.
**********************************************************************************
The older work wanted to describe the social structure and social placement of science as a whole
but did not try to explain particular scientific beliefs in sociological terms. The newer approach has
tried to use sociological methods to explain why scientists believe what they do, why they behave as
they do, and how scientific thinking and practice change over time.
The most famous project in this new form of sociology of science is the strong program in the
sociology of scientific knowledge. Symmetry principle: scientific beliefs are products of the same
general kinds of forces as other kinds of belief. Scientists are people who work in an unusual kind of
local community. But it is still a community in which beliefs are established and defended via local
norms that are human creations, maintained by social interaction. The norms themselves vary
between the tribal community and the community of scientists, but the same general principles
apply in both cases. Most importantly, we should not give the Real World a special role in the
explanation of scientific belief that it does not have in the explanation of other beliefs that pass local
community norms. The strong program is also often associated with relativism (there is no single set
of standards entitled to govern the justification of beliefs). A famous problem for relativists is the
application of relativism to itself. The problem does have various solutions, but it can definitely lead
to tangles. Unfortunately, that is what happened in sociology of science. The application of the field’s
principles to itself led to interminable discussions that have weighed down the field.
**********************************************************************************
Just as the strong program elbowed aside earlier social accounts of science in the 1970s, it was to be
partially elbowed aside in turn, in the 1980s.
Back to Contents
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller paulord. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.