These are my answers that I used to achieve a near perfect 95/100 marks on the Year 13 Unit 3 Criminology controlled assessment. Of course, I changed it as needed during the exam, but these were the backbones of my answers. This resource covers AC 2.1. This detailed answer is well-developed after t...
hey!! thanks for leaving a review and best of luck with unit 3. hope it went well if you've already done it and feel free to message if you have any questions! <3
By: binderjitsandhux • 1 month ago
By: rin4 • 2 weeks ago
hiya! i'm glad 2.1 helped you out :) ... wishing you the best of luck for unit three!!
By: amrita90 • 11 months ago
By: kierawood111 • 1 year ago
By: rin4 • 11 months ago
hi i'm so glad these documents helped you out :) sending the best of luck for unit three you'll do amazing!
By: nevehastings • 1 year ago
By: rin4 • 1 year ago
heya !! it's great that you found 2.1 useful -- thanks for leaving a review and good luck with unit three :)
By: h15 • 1 year ago
By: rin4 • 1 year ago
thank you for leaving a review :) sending you the best of luck with unit three - you'll do great !
Seller
Follow
rin4
Reviews received
Content preview
AC 2.1: Explain the Requirements of the CPS for the Prosecution of Suspects
The Crown Prosecution Services (CPS) is the main public prosecutor in England and Wales. It was set
up in 1985 under the ‘Prosecution of Offences Act 1985’, and they decide if there is enough evidence
for a case to go to court. As part of their role, the CPS determines the appropriate charges in more
complex and serious cases, prepares case for court, and provides information, assistance, and
support to victims and prosecution witnesses. The CPS follows guidelines called the ‘Full Code Test’
(FCT), which is split into two parts. These are the ‘Evidential Test’ and the ‘Public Interest Test’.
The ‘Evidential Test’ (ET) happens before prosecuting and looks at if there is sufficient evidence to
potentially convict a suspect. Three questions must be asked to decide this:
1. Is the evidence allowed in court?
If the evidence cannot be used in court, then it cannot be used to convict a suspect. Therefore, if it is
allowed in court and the CPS believes it could help to secure a guilty verdict, the evidence will be
used in court.
2. Is the evidence reliable?
If the evidence is reliable, then it can be trusted. This might be because the evidence comes from a
reliable source, such as investigative officials or a trustworthy witness. If it is not reliable and
trustworthy, then it cannot be used in court.
3. Is the evidence credible?
If evidence is credible, it can be believed, but not necessarily always trusted. The CPS could analyse if
evidence is credible by, for example, comparing pieces of evidence to see if there are any
inconsistencies. If there are none, then the evidence can likely be considered credible.
A case study which the ET can be applied to is that of Damilola Taylor. He was a 10-year-old boy who
was killed in a block of flats after he was stabbed by a 12 and 13-year-old. The CPS should have
found that the evidence collected did not pass the ET, because they didn’t cross-reference all
available evidence effectively - otherwise, they would have found that the 14-year-old key witness
was lying about what she had seen. If the CPS had not allowed the case to pass the ET, the
inaccurate evidence wouldn’t have been used in court.
If the ET guidelines are met, the CPS moves on to the second stage of the FCT: the ‘Public Interest
Test’ (PIT). A decision must be made as to whether a prosecution is required in the public interest.
Another set of questions must be asked to decide this:
1. How serious is the offence?
A parking fine is not considered a serious crime, meaning it would not pass the PIT, as the driver
would not be seen as a danger to society. As well as this, murder could be compared to
manslaughter, and it would be considered more in the public interest to take a murder case to court
than a case of manslaughter.
2. What is the suspect’s level of culpability?
In other words – how blameable are they? For example, an offender who planned every decision
they made is much more blameable than an offender whose mental health plays a heavy part in the
actions they make.
3. What harm has the victim suffered?
This may be in the form of having lost their job, having been exploited, or in extreme cases they may
have been injured or killed. The higher level of harm a victim has suffered, the more that a
prosecution is required in the public interest.
4. Suspect’s age and maturity?
The age and maturity of a suspect can play an important part in how seriously they are convicted,
and sometimes if they are even convicted at all. If, for example, a 22-year-old and a 12-year-old
committed the same crime, the 12-year-old would be treated more leniently. This is because despite
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rin4. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.37. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
