Three models of decision making: Rational actor model, organizational process model, and
governmental politics model (bureaucratic politics)
Rational actor model: actors operate as ‘blocks’ with clear intentions; the decision is a calculated
answer for a strategic problem which maximizes own preferences.
Rational actor model critique: rational explanations are often all too easy; underestimates other
important factors that are of influence; not all decision makers know what they want.
Organizational process model: from what organizational context did a decision emerge; includes
SOPs; looking for solutions based on standard operating procedures, quasi-independent
organizations which avoid insecurity.
Governmental politics model (bureaucratic politics): focusses on negotiations and disputes; the
decision is often an outcome of negotiations, an outcome which nobody aspired to or desired.
Two biases when assessing decision-making: the outcome bias and the survivorship bias
The outcome bias: judges the quality of decision making by its result; ignores the odds of success
and other mitigating factors
The survivorship bias: selects the decisions that outperformed and established conclusions based on
their attributes; overlooks the whole dataset and ignores decisions with similar characteristics that
failed to perform well
Three sources of legitimate authority: traditional authority, legal-rational authority, and charismatic
authority
Traditional authority: tradition dictates who has authority and how this authority can be used; the
ability to rule is passed down
Legal-rational authority: empowered by a belief in the content of the law or natural law; obedience
is not given to a person but a set of uniform principles, i.e. bureaucracy.
Charismatic authority: stems from the belief in the exemplary characteristics of the leaders; can be
“routinized”
The policy making cycle: evaluation, agenda setting, alternative selection, and implementation.
Agenda setting: the process by which subjects, and problems get on the agenda
Policy agenda: the list of subjects or problems which governmental officials or other decision makers
are paying serious attention to at any given time.
Streams model: John w. Kindom; problem, political, and policy stream join; can deal with problem
construction, attention cycle, role of media, and limited processing capability; for understanding why
something is happening.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller heleen_klapwijk. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.62. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.