Essay
BTEC level 3 Unit 11 P4
- Course
- Institution
BTEC level 3 Unit 11 P4
[Show more]
10 reviews
By: ollo • 4 year ago
By: premeetsoekhoe • 6 year ago
By: ikrammohamed • 6 year ago
By: lizzygoldup • 6 year ago
By: saidtanouyat • 6 year ago
By: kkkkk1 • 5 year ago
By: vilas • 6 year ago
Seller
Follow
bvhhrlm
Reviews received
Content preview
For this p4 I will be describing the use of techniques to identify perceived quality gabs for KLM. I willuse techniques like a gab analysis, quality circles, benchmarking, value chain, alignment of value
chains and the fishbone analysis.
According to a few complaints the food wasn’t good from the flights to the United States. These
complaints ware about 15% from the total complaints about the KLM. In these complaints was said
that the food tasted and smelled disgusting. This problem mostly happened with flights from
Amsterdam to the United States. Within the complaints a lot of people also said that they would
rather choose Delta or United Airline to fly with instead of KLM. These complaints were found on
https://www.reisgraag.nl/klm/ervaringen/?q=&landId=&p=2. KLM can look for other gabs by doing a
gab analysis they can for example make a questionnaire where the customers rate the services of
KLM from 1-10 then KLM can improve the points that have a low score. When done this KLM can
make a gab analysis , this is the difference between what customers get and what their expectation
was.
You can put this problem into a fishbone analysis. A fishbone analysis as a tool that is used to solve
problems within companies like KLM. In the head of the fish you put the problem that has happened
in this case it is the bad food on the certain flights. In the bones of the fish you need to put different
categories that cause these certain problems. under these categories you need to put the subjects
that are covered by these categories. Categories that can be used for the fishbone of KLM can be:
People: because the staff may not understand the problem with the food
Measurements: the food is not measured with other airlines so KLM doesn’t know their
quality
Materials: are the materials used within the food good materials so they shouldn’t be out of
date
Methods: are the recipes followed regarding the making of the food.
Above is the fishbone of the quality gab we had, and I thought about 8 possible couses of the
problem but I think four of them are the real causes, the four I think that are the real causes are:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bvhhrlm. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now