2.2 Measuring individual differences
Ideographic approach:
• Focus on individual – case studies
• Qualitative approach – interviews, diaries
Nomothetic
• Focus is on similarities between individuals – identifying the basic
structure of personality
• Quantitative approach – Psychometric tests, questionaires
PSYCHOMETRIC TESTS
• Personality measures to look at stable traits over time
• Ability measure: IQ, Communication
• Motivation and attitudes
• Neuropsychological: Diagnosis conditions
2.3 Reliability and Validity
GOOD QUESTIONS! Internal reliability
GOOD QUESTIONS HAVE: • Are all the question/aspects of the test actually testing the same thing?
Clarity:
- Only one possible meaning (unambiguous)
- Clear and concise wording
Questions with reverse wording
- Require person to read carefully
Leading questions Doesn't test smoking
- May steer the respondent
RELIABILITY (TEST-RETEST)
Embarrassing questions • Reliability of the test over time (1 week, 2 week, 1 month)
- Don't want to make our respondent uncomfortable If you test the same group twice, will you get the same/similar results?
• CORRELATION OF 0.7 IS SATISFACTORY
Hypothetical questions/statement
- Put a respondent never experienced. VALIDITY
Does the test measure what we claim it does?
RESPONSE FORMAT/SCALES Eg. Self-esteem
DIFFERENT TYPES:
1. CONVERGENT: association with other similar measures?
Self-esteem correlates with self-worth,social skills
2. CONCURRENT: Acceptable correlation with other measures of the same construct?
Any other measures of self-esteem?
3. DISCRIMINANT: No association with measures it shouldn't be related to?
Intelligence shouldn't be related to with self-esteem
4. FACE VALIDITY: Does it look "at face-value" to be measuring what we want to measure?
subjective
5. CONTENT VALIDITY: Are all the areas of the phenomenon being measures using our scale?
Do we include all the areas of self-esteem?
6. PREDICITVE VALIDITY : Can this sclae predict how people might act in future?
High-esteem scores = more confidence? Less self-criticism?
2.4 Qualitative data in personality research
QUALITATIVE METHODS
• Allow describe personality population level and apply to individuals
• Limits applying learnt from population to individual
• The uniqueness of individuals and their situations means this approach looses much info may be
important in understanding people & how their responses vary in different psychological domains.
• Qualitative methods help tap into more hidden information
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AND ID
WORDS AS DATA
QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS
LECTURES Page 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller chilllax. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.73. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.