Comprehensive summary of this course with all the informative images! This summary regards the first 6 lectures. See my other summaries for the other lectures! I got graded this course an 8.5! :)
HC 1: etiology of mental traits and disorders 27/10/20
Introduction
-Traits (in a biological way): impulsivity, mood, (anti) social behavior, stress-sensitivity, resilience and vulnerability are
behavioral traits.
• Each of these traits exists along a spectrum -> For example: impulsivity (extremely thoughtful, difficulties decision
taking – extremely impulsive)
-What is normal and abnormal behavior? Is normal what the most people do or what is healthy? Or botch?
-Which traits are a disorder or a variation?
-Other traits: IQ, extraversion, blood pressure etc.
-In this module we talk about mental traits and mental disorders!
-Disorders: diabetes, obesitas, autism (?), depression, schizophrenia -> Were traits become pathological.
-How do traits and disorders rise in general? What are the factors? Two groups:
• Genes/DNA -> nature
• Environmental factors -> nurture
o Can also be biological, like nutrition and pregnancy.
o Example -> trauma -> causes stress (big problem)
-Few years ago, some diseases were explained by nurture events, like a refrigerator mother can give rise to autism to her
child! And being gay was a result of an overly present mother.
• Later -> The role of biological factors became clearer (nature).
-Classic nature-nurture discussion -> a bit outdated.
• Hard reductionism -> “all psychiatric illness is best explained solely in terms of molecular neuroscience”.
-Etiology models for psychiatric disease need to be pluralistic or multilevel!
• Best understood from biological, psychological and sociocultural and economic perspective.
• Break down dichotomy between nature-nurture, but view brain as in constant interaction with environment,
society and culture via plasticity.
• Nature and nurture is a balance! They don’t stand in front of each toher.
-The most brain disorders are not multigenetic, but multifactorial disorders (also environmental factors ofcourse!).
-Often complex interactions and causal loops.
Genes and psychiatry
-Complex puzzle, puzzle parts -> genetics and environmental factors.
-From twin + adoption studies: several behavioural traits and psychiatric diseases moderate / high heritability.
• Heritability -> Proportion of variance in symptoms that is explained by the variance in genetic factors.
o Does not mean that if the heritability is 75%, that you’ll have a 75% change of getting the disorder if one
of your parents has it.
o It looks at a population level, a variation in all the people. What is the cause of the variation of their
symptoms? Is t due to genes or environmental factors?
o Means: for the whole population of the disorder 75% of the variation that you see in symptoms you can
explain through their genes. 25% you can expain by the variation by their environmental factors!
o Major depression -> 40-50%
o ADHD -> 75%
o Autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia -> around 80%
-Very difficult to find risk genes! But it is known that there are risk genes! What they did: compare the concordance
(overeenkomst) of a certain trait with monozygotic twins compared with dizygotic twins.
• Monozygotic -> Share 100% of the DNA, if the one has schizophrenia, a relatively very high change the other will
develop it as well.
• Dizygotic -> If monozygotic is 50% dor schizophrenia, this is 6-70% in dizygotic.
o Have about 50% of their DNA in common, but their environmental factors are the same (which also have
an influence on the envelopment of psychiatric disorders of course).
• So, comparing the concordance rate, if it is higher in monozygotic? -> heritability is higher (because more is the
results of genes).
• Missing heritability -> The unknown risk factors.
o What could be the reason that finding this genes is so hard? -> Thinking that one or a few genes are the
risk genes is too simply thought.
▪ Model of single / few risk genes -> overly simplistic paradigm
▪ Classing theory -> Single abnormal gene → abnormal gene product → neuronal malfunction →
mental illness.
• BUT it thus shows, that single abnormal gene is not sufficient to cause mental disorders!
, ▪ What is the pathway from gene to mental illness/phenotype? -> new explanations/new
hypothesis.
-New models explaining this pathway:
• Complex genetics / Diathesis(stress)-risk model (explained in this lecture)
• Differential Susceptibly to Environment Hypothesis (explained in ‘neurobiology of resilience’)
• Balancing Selection Hypothesis (explained in ‘mental illness and creativity’)
-These are complex models and the new wat of doing research is mainly via an endophenotype (-> genotype to
phenotype) approach.
-Complex genetics / Diathesis-risk model -> Predisposition (genetic) + environmental stress = disease (combination)
• A new paradigm, with the hypothesis: mental illness is caused by multiple small contributions from several genes,
all interacting with environmental stressors.
o One of the reasons why it is hard to find the risk genes (because there are a lot)
• You’ll inherit the risk and not the disease! -> Complex set of risk factors that bias person toward illness but do not
cause it.
• Reaching tipping point -> high probability developing disorder (when a lot of genetic and environmental risks
affects you).
o Like drops of water in a bottle and eventually one drop leads to disease, but it is not only this drup, but all
these drops together what cause the flood/disorder.
Endophenotype approach
-Pathway from genotype to phenotype is such a complex pathway, because between them there is so much going on!
-Solution -> endophenotype approach
• Track down important intermediaries between gene (genotype) and
disease/behavior (phenotype).
-Makes determining the pathway easier by the search of the endophenotypes ->
Variables that are somewhere in between the genotype and the phenotype.
• They are measurable, inheritable and closely linked to the disease!
• More precisely measurable than the illness itself. Otherwise it is
extremely difficult to diagnose a certain disease.
• Two types:
o Biological endophenotypes (comes as first in the pathway)
▪ Measurable biological phenomena:
• Electrophysiological response to startle (schrik)
o Example: abnormal response of startle
is associated with schizophrenia.
• Neuroimaging response to information
processing
o Example: activation levels of the
amygdala are above normal in anxiety and depression.
▪ This is more easily to measure then depression itself!
• Activation of certain brain circuit
, o Symptom/(or)system endophenotypes
▪ Single symptoms associated with mental illness:
• Insomnia
• Executive dysfunction
• Hallucinations
• Poor fear conditioning
• Anhedonia -> problem with experiencing pleasure
▪ Mental illness -> Diagnosed if you tick enough boxes (for now).
▪ Better to treat symptoms probably than treating the disease.
• Because the brain can look very different between one person with depression and
another person with depression.
-So, an endophenotype approach:
• Levels of genotype → molecules → circuits → information processing (biological endophenotype) → single
symptom (system endophenotype) → full syndrome of mental disorder
• Closer to gene on pathway > more readily linked to gene
o Endophenotype approach makes it far easier to link risk genes to endophenotypes (biological or
symptom) than to link it to the disease.
• Genes only loosely linked to psychiatric disorders, therefore hard to identify -> easier with this approach, because
you make it more measurable.
-Psychopathology and brain circuits:
• Etiology of psychiatric disorders is moving beyond receptors, enzymes and other molecules as causes for mental
illness. For example: “a psychosis is a consequence of too high levels of dopamine”, we did say that because we
did see that treating this molecule/neurotransmitter/receptor helped, so it must be the cause then, but we now
know that these disorders have a lot of factors that are involved in this disorder.
• New paradigm -> Psychiatric symptoms are increasingly linked to malfunctioning specific brain circuits.
o Because altered working of receptors/NTs/transporters etc results in a altered neurotransmission in the
synaps.
• Genes + environmental risk factors conspire to produce inefficient information processing in neuronal circuitry.
• Brain imaging -> focus on brain circuits.
-One thing is not included in this picture (above), what is this?
, -Why are subtle molecular abnormalities not more ‘penetrant’ at behavioral level? Why does a single altered gene not
directly lead to problems in the behavioral?
• Because: we have so much complementary/redundant backup systems! -> If there is something wrong is system
1, you’ll always will have system 2 who also can do the job (this is how our body works).
• So, risk genes are not necessarily sufficient to cause mental illness.
• SO, with this concluded, it is the combination with environmental risk factors (stress, life events, biological
stressors such as viruses, toxins etc).
• So, multiple systems are influenced (in a bad way).
Social-ecological framework & Environmental risk factors
-You have both risk decreasing and increasing factors!
-‘Social-ecological framework’ -> No single factor can explain, by the WHO (2014).
• Dynamic interplay of multiple risk and protective factors.
• Risk and protective factors: occurring along different levels -> ‘social ecology continuum’ (WHO, 2014):
o Individual (also genetic factors are individual factors)
o Relationship
o Cultural/environmental factors
-Individual risk factors:
• Genes (not environmental)
• Pre/peri natal (voor de geboorte of tijdens) risk factors:
o Maternal stress during pregnancy
o Maternal nutritional deficiency
o Maternal use of tobacco / alcohol / drugs / medication
o Birth complications:
▪ Perinatal nutritional deficiency (too low oxygen for example)
▪ Maternal separation -> Risk factor at level of the relationship
-Relationship risk factors:
• Abuse: sexual, physical or emotional
• Neglect (verwaarlozing)
• Poor parental care
• These factors have a very big influence -> suspects of the environmental risk factors.
-Environmental/biological environmental risk factors:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller leetje99. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
