100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Criminal Law. Mens Rea $4.71   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Criminal Law. Mens Rea

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The concept of Mens Rea within the scope of english criminal law and with the proper and relevant case law. Color coding: Orange: title / subtitles Pink: very important Yellow: legislation (includes case law and acts of Parliament) Green: important

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • February 14, 2023
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Criminal Law: Chapter 5



MENS REA
KEY TERMS:

Intention The aim or purpose of D

Negligence D’s failure to act according to the standard of the reasonable person

Recklessness The unreasonable taking of a risk by D

DIFFERENT TYPES OF MENS REA

INTENTION

MOHAN (1976) DEFINITION OF INTENTION

´Aim`, ´a decision to bring about a certain consequence, even if that consequence is unlikely`

CHRISTOFIDES (2001) D took a piece of wood and started hitting another persona, several times on the
head. Held that there was no reason to have a definition for intention when the facts are so obvious.

MOLONEY (1985), LORD BRIDGE Intention is something different from motive or desire, meaning that
the law is not concerned with the reason of why D acted. However, motive may be important to prove the
existence of intention,

Oblique intent. Cases where D acts in order to bring one particular consequence, but it is highly likely that
another will occur. In such cases:

WOLLIN (1999)

1) Was death or serious injury virtually certain to result from D’s actions?

2) Did D appreciate that death or serious injury was virtually certain to result from their actions?



If the answer to both questions is YES, the jury is entitled to find intention.

There are four points that should be stressed from the current law:

1) If it is not D’s intention to kill or cause GBH, and these two offences were not considered by D, the
jury is not permitted to find intention.

2) To satisfy the ´Woollin` test, it must be shown that death of GBH was virtually certain, but if in fact
they were not, the jury is not entitled to find intention.

3) Foresight of virtual certainty is not intent, but it is evidence from which the jury may fin intent.

4) The direction approved in WOOLLIN states that the jury may find intention, but not that they have to.

RECKLESSNESS

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nazaretcarosnchez. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.71
  • (0)
  Add to cart