CITI All Modules Questions And Answers 2023

CITI All Modules Questions And Answers 2023. Which of the following is an example of how the principle of beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects? - Determining that the study has a maximization of benefits and a minimization of risks. An investigational biologic administered to the first two subjects in a Phase II clinical trial was not appropriately screened for two viral contaminants, HIV and Hepatitis B, due to human error in the screening process. Follow-up testing indicated that the subjects and their partners were not infected. The subjects and others were notified of the increased risk. - This is an unanticipated problem requiring notification to the IRB and FDA Housekeeping employees of the medical center were recruited for a federally funded study of blood pressure, blood count levels, infectious disease history, and job stress. The interviews and blood tests were conducted in a private location not affiliated with the study center. Follow-up interviews were conducted in the same location. The study coordinator stopped at the cafeteria on her way back to the study office after the second study visit for the last three study subjects and lost the three file folders. Records of one subject indicated he had a history of a sexually transmitted disease and another had recently been treated for tuberculosis. The subjects were notified of the loss. Following this event, the IRB approved a protocol change requiring that all records be transmitted electronically to the study office using the medical center's secure network. - This is an unanticipated problem and not an adverse event. A Data Safety Monitoring Board report for an investigator-initiated investigational drug study indicates a significantly higher than anticipated rate of an expected adverse event. This event required revision of the informed consent form to disclose the higher rate. A change in the eligibility criteria of the protocol to reduce the risk was implemented. Current subjects would be reconsented. - This is an unanticipated problem A subject received the wrong study drug resulting in severe nausea and vomiting, and a visit to the emergency room for treatment. The subject notified the study coordinator the day after the emergency room visit. The study coordinator reviewed the subject's study records and discovered the error. The coordinator notified the subject of the study drug error, which caused the nausea and vomiting. The investigator notified the IRB and the IRB approved a revision of the standard pharmacy procedure for administering investigational drugs. - This is an unanticipated problem, which resulted in an adverse event. A study requires that each subject be given two study drugs. The first study drug is given on Day 1. A second study drug is given on Day 7 to counteract the toxicity of Drug 1. Subject # 4-706 is given Drug 1 on Day 1. Due to a snowstorm, Subject 4-706 is delayed for several days before returning to the site for Drug 2. Missing the administration of Drug 2 on Day 7 placed the subject at risk of significant toxicity. This event required the subject be notified of the increased risk and required close monitoring of the subject by phone. - This is an unanticipated problem that does not include an adverse event A subject participates in a drug study because treatment is available at no or reduced cost, and he could not otherwise afford it. This is an example of: - Economic vulnerability According to the authors, there are four common abuses that historically are described as giving rise to vulnerability . Which response below contains the correct four? - Physical control, coercion, undue influence, and manipulation NBAC proposed a concept of vulnerability in research based on features of potential subjects or of their situation. Which of the following was not included as possibly leading to vulnerability? - High potential for individual benefit from participating in research When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: - Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Which is true of inducements in research? - Inducements constitute an "undue influence" if they alter a potential subject's decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research. In considering NBAC's analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: - Situational cognitive vulnerability The National Research Act of 1974 - Established the National Commission. Issued in 1974, 45 CFR 46 raised to regulatory status: - US Public Health Service Policy Informed consent is considered an application of which Belmont principle? - Respect for Persons