100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Aantekenigen academic skills $6.54   Add to cart

Class notes

Aantekenigen academic skills

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Alle benodigde informatie uit het boek en van de colleges voor het tentamen. De belangrijkste stof staat erin en ook vragen en antwoorden van de colleges.

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • February 22, 2023
  • 14
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Melker
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Academic skills aantekeningen
Lecture 4: argumentation and rationality
Instrumental rationality:

- Refers to efficiency, cost saving or effectiveness.
- Cause based or means-end argumentation. You set your goal and then look at the resources
you will use.
- Tells us little about the real goals or what is important for you.

Social rationality:

- Refers to fairness, rightfulness, social tradition, law, etc.
- Value and norm-based argumentation, classification:
- We try to apply these norms to things we would like to do; we show that we would like to do
is rightful, fair and this helps us to legitimize, motivate that we are doing this.

Expressive rationality:

- Refers to subjective likings, personal interests, motives
- Motivational arguments
- It refers most to what you like, to your motives, interests.

3 debates from chapter 3-5, on the rationality of:

- City of Rotterdam deciding for a public artwork
- UK government deciding to extend Gurkha pension rights
- Private organizations deciding for flexible work environments.

Argumentation analysis can help to explore these reasons, and our rationality.

Chapter 3: city of Rotterdam deciding for a public artwork

Mayor, Aldermen, Advisors
(expressive reasons):

- Wanted a public artwork
for Rotterdam Cultural
Capital 2001.
- That would attract
attention
- That was state of the art
- McCarthy’s proposal was
best fit.
- Initially in color, but that
seemed too provocative.

McCarthy warned (social
rationality objection):
Can your city handle this? Yes this is Holland.

, Irrationalities addressed by:

Local and Christian parties (social and expressive objections):

- This work is obscene
- Is not suitable for public space
- Cannot be shown to our children
- Is not worth the money, it is awful
- If that is a Christmas tree, it needs to be green. Why make it abstract so you can interpret
it in different ways.

Art critics (expressive):

- This work is too elitist. It was not fitting for a public space.

Due tot the normative resistance the work was exposed in museum Boijmans van Beuningen (SR
rebuttal on ER). Now it is one of the most loved sculptures in Rotterdam, attracting many tourists (ER
rebuttal on SR objections).

Irrationalities:

- Con: intolerable desire to expose, unfeasible and distasteful desires (extreme resistance):
SR +IR + ER rebuttals or ER.
- Pro: upsetting norms: soft porno on billboards for breast augmentation is acceptable but
a sex toy is not. ER rebuttal of SR critique.

Chapter 4: Gurkha pension rights

Government/ MoD (social and instrumental arguments pro):

- Pension and settlement rights extension follows up on high court ruling 2008.
- New policy is more generous than agreed on in employment contracts.
- New policy now also applies to pre-1997 veterans with a 20 years contract:
 no cost explosion, sufficient feasibility.
 No legal issues with Nepal (taking citizens away).

Gurkha’s, Lumley, public opinion (mainly SR rebuttals):

- All veterans deserve equal rights
- Unfair for soldiers with 15 years contract, they had to have 20 years contract to be
allowed to stay in the UK.
- Gurkha’s have been loyal, deserve fair treatment.
- Gurkhas are no average immigrants.
- Costs are still manageable, much less than for bail out banks.

Conclusions:

In general investment rationality was flawed. Rights extension was half-hearted.

Irrationalities Government/MoD:

- Immoral new rights (SR evaluation of SR): soldier veterans were excluded. They only
served 15 years, so hardly any soldier can settle in the UK.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Floorrotscheid. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.54
  • (0)
  Add to cart