This is the complete a - z note on the company law topic, you just have to go through it once and you can easily attempt the question and get A ++ grade in finals
this is a marked answer by a senior professor you just need to read it and you can even write the same just need to change it a bit ...
StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Zainub Gillani (zaniub.gillani@gmail.com)
, lOMoARcPSD|17625498
Directors have common law, statutory and fiduciary duties to
prevent the abuse of powers by directors. These duties are
generally owed to the company by the directors, and the duties
are not owed to individual shareholders (Percival V Wright). The
fiduciary and common law duties are now codified in the
Companies Act 2006.
Under s.171 CA 2006 directors have duty to act within their
powers, to abide by the terms of the company. Duty to exercise
their powers under the company’s constitution for proper purpose
is usually at issue in relation to directors power to issue new
shares. If the power to issue new shares is made with the object
of undermining the majority shareholding of a person this would
constitute a breach of the proper purpose doctrine. In Howard
Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd (1974), it was held by the Privy
Council that the allotment is made in breach of the proper
purpose doctrine as it had the effect of destroying ab existing
majority or creating a new majority which did not previously exist.
As such the allotment was held to be invalid. But in Tech Corp Ltd
v Millar (1972) the British Columbian Supreme Court held that an
allotment of shares designed to defeat a takeover was proper
even though this was against the wish of the existing shareholder
and deprived him of control. So it appears so long the directors
are acting in the best interest of the company they are unlikely to
be found to be in breach of proper purpose doctrine.
S.172 required directors promoting shareholder interests, to take
account of the factors affecting the company’s relationships and
performance. The question of what will promote the success of
the company is one for the director’s good faith judgement. This
appears to be a purely subjective test but it seems highly unlikely
that this interpretation will stand primarily because it makes
monitoring of directors practically impossible. Since in S.170(3)
and (4), they stated that “regard shall be had to the
corresponding common law rules and equitable principles in
interpreting and applying the general duties” an objective
element is likely to be incorporated. Time will tell whether this
Downloaded by Zainub Gillani (zaniub.gillani@gmail.com)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zainubgillani. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
