100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Non-fatal offences $7.09   Add to cart

Class notes

Non-fatal offences

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture notes on non-fatal offences

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • March 8, 2023
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Criminal law lecturer
  • Non-fatal offences
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
CL - Week 8 – Nonfatal (non-sexual) offences against the person

- 1.2 million incidents of violence estimated by CSEW for the survey ending March 2020
- Incidents of violence take place in the home – Anthony Giddens ‘home is the most dangerous
place in modern society, more likely to be attacked in the home rather than the street’
- Wide spectrum of violence – from threat to serious physical harm where the victim is almost
dead
- How do we classify harm? - one way is to create separate offences – 1861 Offences against the
persons act

Offences Against the Persons Act (OAPA) 1861

- Assault – battery – S47 – S20 – S18 with S18 the most serious offence and assault the least
serious

Sentencing of Assault

- S.39 CJA 1988 – power to charge assault and battery – max sentence 6 months or a fine
- Summary only offence
- If certain requirements are met the offence can be tried in the crown court

Assault – common/technical assault

Actus reus

- Any conduct causing the result
o An act is required = Fagan v Metropolitain police commissioner [1969]
o However, if D creates a dangerous situation and fails to act this may result in an assault
– so can be an assault through omission
o Can words alone amount to an assault – discussed in case of Ireland and Burstow–
decided that yes words could amount to an assault
o Can a conditional threat be negated by words? - yes – seen in the case of Tuberville v
Savage [1669]
- V is a person
- V apprehends an imminent threat of unlawful force
o Apprehends means an individual anticipates/expects something to happens – it does
not mean anything to do with fear
o Imminent – given a broad interpretation by the courts – case of Smith v Chief
superintendent of woking police station [1983] - sufficiently immediately for the
purposes of the offence
o Case of R v Constanza – the court took the view in relation to this point, that V was
caused to apprehend violence ‘at some time not excluding the future’
o Not clear how much time can pass before it would be considered ‘immediate’ - jury to
decide
- Unlawful
o Not acting in self-defense
- Personal violence/force

, o Any unwanted touching, needing not to be serious

Men's rea – intentionally or recklessly causing V to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence –
from the case of Venna [1976]

Live webinar – Battery and S.47

Battery

Sentencing

- S.39 CJA 1988 – power to charge assault and battery
- Maximum sentence 6 months and/or a fine
- Summary only offence
- If certain requirements are met the offence can be tried in the crown court – s.40 CJA

Actus reus = any unlawful, nonconsensual touching, does not have to be carried out through person-to-
person touch

Indirect touching?

Can be carried out through an object e.g., car: Fagan [1969]

Savage [1992] 1 AC 699, HL, by throwing a beer at someone

Smith [1866] 176 ER 910 by spitting

Touching does not have to be to Vs body/person – it can be V’s clothing: Thomas [1985] 81 Cr App R 331
(CA): “There can be no dispute that if you touch a person’s clothes while he is wearing them that is
equivalent to touching him”.

Unlawful touching:

Collins v Wilcock (1984) exception created to allow for the exigencies of everyday life

Can one consent to battery?

Consent is a defense to battery

Distinction between touching someone in an everyday way and in a way that is not everyday

S 47 OAPA

- ‘Actual bodily harm’

Sentencing

- Triable either way
- Magistrates – maximum 6 months or a fine
- CC – maximum 5 years

AR and MR of assault or battery + occasioned = caused (Roberts (1972) = ABH

Examples of ABH

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlie-annmarron. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.09
  • (0)
  Add to cart