Other
PVL3702 ASSIGNMENT 01 SEMESTER 2 2023 ANSWERS 100 % PASS
- Course
- Institution
PVL3702 ASSIGNMENT 01 SEMESTER 2 2023 ANSWERS 100 % PASS
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
fbinstitute
Reviews received
Content preview
PVL3702 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2023, Carol, an owner of an exclusive bicycle shop advertised a special limited-
edition bicycle for sale, and invited the public to make offers for the bicycle.
Jane and Portia were among many people who submitted written offers for the
bicycle. Jane’s offer was for R150 000, and Portia’s offer was for R190 000.
Although Carol intended to accept Portia’s offer, she erroneously wrote a letter
to Jane, wherein she accepted Jane’s offer. Jane believes that an enforceable
contract was formed but Carol denies this. Apply the direct reliance theory and
advise if a legally binding contract was concluded between Carol and Jane.
Discuss fully and refer to case law in your answer. Do not apply the Consumer
Protection Act 68 of 2008.
Identifying the problem
The facts seemingly indicate that Carol and Jane have not reached
consensus based on the will theory. If so, it is necessary to determine if
Carol may be held bound to a contract with Jane, based on the reliance
theory, or whether Carol will escape liability. Only the direct approach to
the reliance theory will be considered.
Discussing the relevant law applicable to the problem, referring to the
relevant case law, AND applying the law to the facts of the problem
The direct reliance approach can only be applied after it has been
determined that Carol acted under a material mistake. It must thus be
determined whether agreement (consensus ad idem) as a contractual
basis exists between the parties, as required in terms of the will theory.
The first step is to determine whether agreement (consensus ad idem) as
a contractual basis exists between the parties, as required in terms of the
will theory. Consensus has three elements:1 the parties must seriously
intend to contract, be of one mind as to the material aspects of the
proposed agreement (the terms and the identity of the parties to it), and
be conscious of the fact that their minds have met.
In the present case the parties were not in agreement as to the
consequences they wished to create: Carol intended to accept Portia’s
offer, she erroneously wrote a letter to Jane, wherein she accepted
Jane’s offer. This is a mistake as to the
1
(Hutchison and Pretorius (eds) The law of Contract in South Africa (Oxford University Press Southern Africa
2012) 14 85):
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fbinstitute. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.27. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now