Other
LPL4802 ASSIGNMENT 01 SEMESTER 2 2023 ANSWERS 100 % PASS
- Course
- Institution
LPL4802 ASSIGNMENT 01 SEMESTER 2 2023 ANSWERS 100 % PASS
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
fbinstitute
Reviews received
Content preview
LPL4802 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2023THERE ARE 3 VERSIONS OF ANSWERS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT
,Study the case of Economic Freedom Fighters and others v Manuel 2021 (3)
SA 425 (SCA) and answer the question below:
In para [92], the court exclaimed [sic], “An unliquidated claim for damages
must be pursued by institution of an action.” However, contrary to this
accepted practice, the attorneys for the respondent brought the claim of
damages for defamation in an application proceeding. Discuss fully, the
reasons the court puts forward in support of accepted practice, that general
damages for defamation must be instituted in an action proceeding. Refer to
relevant case law and legislation in your answer.
,VERSION 1
The SCA affirmed a High Court decision that a political party had
defamed aformer politician by labeling him "corrupt and nepotistic" and
referring to theprocedure over which he presided as "secretive." The
former politician petitioned the High Court after the publication of a
statement on Twitter by his political party, alleging that the statement
was untrue and detrimental to his image. Although the High Court found
that the political party did not have a defense to the statement's
publishing, it noted that the defense of reasonable publication, which
had previously been limited to media defendants, was now open to non-
media defendants as well.
On March 27, 2019, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) of South Africa
released a statement through their official Twitter account. The
statement accused former South African Finance Minister Trevor Manuel
of nepotism, corruption, and covert behavior in the selection of the South
African Revenue Service Commissioner (SARS). Manuel recused himself
from interviewing one of the applicants, Edward Kieswetter, since
Kieswetter had previously worked at SARS during Manuel's tenure as
Finance Minister. Kieswetter was subsequently selected as the favored
choice by the panel and became SARS Commissioner. The tweeted
statement characterized the procedure as "patently nepotistic and
corrupt" and done in private, and referred to Kieswetter as "not only a
close business colleague and buddy of Trevor Manuel." Additionally, it
said that Kieswetter had a "obvious link to the white capitalist elite,"
implying that he would not maximize tax collection
At the time the statement was posted, the EFF's Twitter account had
over 725 000 followers, and the tweet containing the message had
been retweeted 237 times.
Julius Malema, the EFF's President, tweeted the remark from his own
nearly 2million-follower Twitter account. Additionally, the tweet and
statement garnered media and internet attention. Manuel requested an
urgent declaratory judgment, claiming that the tweet was defamatory,
false, and illegal, and that the order was required to defend his
reputation, after unsuccessfully asking the EFF to remove the statement.
He also sought an order compelling the EFF to remove the tweet from all
of its media platforms, prohibiting the EFF and its associated platforms
, from publishing similar or identical allegations against him in the future,
and compelling the EFF to publish a "unconditional public retraction and
apology."
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fbinstitute. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.43. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now