Class notes
Non-Fatal Sexual Offences
- Course
- Institution
These are my lecture notes on non-fatal sexual offences upon a person. Case law is used to make critical points on the law in these areas.
[Show more]
1 review
By: cj101 • 7 year ago
Seller
Follow
MarkC57
Reviews received
Content preview
CRIMINAL LAWNON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON
What we will be considering in the following lectures are crimes against people which cause
harm (non-sexual) but do not result in death. The offences cover a broad spectrum of
wrongdoing from the merest touching of another to attempted murder. There are a number
of offences that could be considered under the heading Non-Fatal but we will only be
considering the following:
1. Assault
2. Battery
3. Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm
4. Malicious Wounding or Infliction of GBH
5. Wounding /Causing GBH with intent
BASIC READING:
Herring, Chapter 6 and another textbook on non-fatal non-sexual offences
FURTHER READING:
J. Gardner, ‘Rationality and the Rule of Law in Offences Against the Person’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law
Journal 502
E. Genders, ‘Reform of the Offences Against the Person Act: Lessons from the Law in Action’ [1999] Criminal
Law Review 689
M. Hirst, ‘Assault, Battery and Indirect Violence’ [1999] Criminal Law Review 557
J. Horder, ‘Rethinking Non-fatal Offences Against the Person’ (1994) 14 OJLS 335
Key to the law is the right to bodily integrity: a person should not be touched against his or
her wishes. This right is protected under the common law + Article 8 of the ECHR.
1. In Thomas (1985) 81 Cr App R 331 (CA) it was held the unwanted touching of the
bottom of a girl’s skirt amounted to a battery. The rubbing of someone’s clothing
might appear to some to be too trivial a harm to justify the intervention of the
criminal law, but reveals the weight attached to the right not to be touched without
one’s consent.
2. Decision of C.O.A. in St George’s Healthcare NHA Trust v S [1998] 3 All ER 673, reveals
the right to bodily integrity is protected, even if there may be a good reason to
infringe upon it. Woman in late stages of labour was advised that she should have a C-
section without it her and her babies life was at risk. She refused, wanting natural
delivery. Hospital authorities obtained a court order permitting them to do so carried
out the operation against her will. CO.A. held the order should not have been
granted. The woman’s right to bodily integrity was held to be previously guarded by
the law.
1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MarkC57. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.12. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now