All the events in detail that one must know for the exam
Summary
All for this textbook (7)
Written for
Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)
Europese Studies
111117056Y
All documents for this subject (3)
Seller
Follow
samolssonsmith
Reviews received
Content preview
1940s
● 1945 - End of WW2
○ European states needed integration to restore them economically and prevent
further conflict
○ US and USSR arose as bipolar superpowers
● 1945 - Bretton Woods System
○ Tied European exchange rates to US dollar that was tied to gold
○ Later replaced by Snake in the Tunnel system in 1970s
● 1948 - Marshall Plan
○ US aid distributed to European countries to help restore their economies
○ Created first intergovernmental organization for European economic cooperation
○ Motivations for US:
■ Political - to restore economies so people would not be receptive to
spread of Communism
■ Economic - would give US a greater market for their exports
● 1949 - Council of Europe in Strasbourg
○ Federalists had called for Council of Europe to create basis for federalist
European institution
○ UK rejected this
○ Failed attempt to create a European federalist state all at once
1950s
● 1950 - Schuman Declaration
○ Said Europe would not be made all at once through a single plan, it would be
built over time
○ Proposed French and German cooperation in ECSC to prevent future conflict
through interdependence
○ Convinced that supranational cooperation in a limited ‘unpolitical’ area would lead
to closer union in the future
■ Functionalism
○ Was in essence a peace plan, so very politically motivated
● 1952 - European Coal and Steel Community Created
○ 1st international organization to be based on supranational authority
○ Institutions included:
■ Supranational High Authority (precursor to EC)
■ Supranational Parliamentary Assembly
■ Intergovernmental council
○ France wanted access to German resources
○ Political motivations were preventing war between France and Germany
● 1955 - EDC and EPC plans pushed aside
○ Failed plan for European superstate
○ France refused signing the EDC because they didn’t want to give up national
sovereignty
, ○ European countries wanted to keep US forces in Europe so they wouldn’t have to
fund their own forces
● 1957 - Treaty of Rome
○ Created the EEC and Euratom
○ Supranational pillar
○ Functionalist, focused on the economy
■ First phase of treaties, not focused on deepening political integration
directly
○ Made up first pillar of the Maastricht Treaty (1992)
● 1957 - EEC established
○ Economic union between 6 member states
○ Aimed to bring economic integration including common market
■ Destroying trade barriers
■ Made a European customs union
○ Agricultural policy supported the French
○ The Dutch needed to focus on European market after loss of the colonies
○ Had broader influence, but more intergovernmental institution than the ECSC
○ Following functionalist plan
○ Has been seen as the revival of the nation state, as it offered economic
prosperity to states that could use this to offer welfare and gain more support
from the people
1960s
● 1960 - EFTA
○ Led by the British
■ Not interested in EEC because of relationship with the colonies and
America
○ More Intergovernmental approach to economic integration
○ Included countries not apart of the EEC e.g. Switzerland, Norway
○ Relative failure in gaining economic growth and global influence
■ UK then applied to join EEC in 1961, but blocked by de Gaulle
● 1963 - De Gaulle Vetoes UKs application to accession into the EEC
○ De Gaulle wanted to ensure CAP was passed in a way that would benefit them,
knowing the UK would not support agricultural plans
○ Angered the other member states
● 1965-6 - Empty Chair Crisis
○ Dispute over whether or not the EEC should become more supranational
■ De Gaulle wanted intergovernmentalism
○ EC was overreaching in their proposal for european taxation
○ France’s representatives refused to show at the institutions
○ De Gaulle was forced back into negotiations with the EEC because of pressures
from the farmers in France
○ Resulted in Luxembourg Compromise
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller samolssonsmith. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.05. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.