Exam (elaborations)
PVL3704 ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS SEMESTER 1, 2023.PASS GUARANTEED.
- Course
- Institution
PVL3704 ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS SEMESTER 1, 2023. PASS GUARANTEED.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Mellissavan
Reviews received
Content preview
PVL3704(ENRICHMENT LIABILITY ANDESTOPPEL) ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS
SEMESTER 1 2023
, QUESTION 1
Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the
expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law.
ANSWER
It must be noted that a causal link must exist between the enrichment and the
impoverished concerned. This simply means that the defendant’s enrichment must be at
the expense of the plaintiff. In most cases the causal link is simple to ascertain, this is
son in matters of direct enrichment.
Problems arise in certain matters dealing with indirect enrichment which involves
another third party. E.g. A enters into a contract with B to build a swimming pool for B. A
mixed B’s address with C’s address and builds the pool on C’s property. The question to
whether C is enriched at the expense of A is explained in terms of case law.
According to De Vos, in his answer to matters of indirect enrichment, he stated that C
will be enriched at B’s expense and that A would claim from B in terms of the contract
and then B will claim from C using an enrichment action.
The views of De Vos were also supported by Jansen J in the case of Gouws v Jester
Pools. The facts of the case were that A had built a swimming pool for B in terms of a
contract between himself and B, and on land that he believed belonged to B, but which
was, in fact the property of C. After B disappeared from the scene without having paid A
for the building of the pool, A brought an enrichment action against C. The action
concerned failed, with Jansen J holding that C had been enriched at B’s expense, and
not at A’s.
The views of De Vos and the judgment propounded in the Gouw’s case were criticised
by Van der Walt who expressed that the at-the-expense-of requirement is satisfied once
assets have been directly transferred from A’s estate to that of C. This means that the
assets passed directly from A to C; hence an enrichment action should be awarded to A
since C was directly enriched at the expense of C.
1|Page
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Mellissavan. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
50064 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now