100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
A* House of Commons v Lords Essay Plan $6.21
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Government And Politics
  6.  
  7. Paper 2: UK Government

Other

A* House of Commons v Lords Essay Plan
 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Paper 2: UK Government
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

An A* essay plan that evaluates which chamber of Parliament is more effective. Loaded w/ precise, detailed A* evidence which facilitates nuanced analysis (AO2) and evaluation (AO3). This helped me to achieve a high A* in Politics. I now study at the University of Cambridge.

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • March 22, 2023
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • house of lords essay plan
  • parliament essay plan
  • politics essay p
  • house of commons essay plan
  • house of commons effective essay plan
  • house of lords effective essay plan
  • house of lords v house of commons

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Government and Politics
  • Paper 2: UK Government
All documents for this subject (15)

Seller

avatar-seller
alexupshall

Reviews received

Content preview

Evaluate the view that the House of Commons plays a more significant OR effective role during the
legislative process than the House of Lords [30]

Introduction Define: p Argument:

Paragraph 1: Weak argument point 1: Weak argument point 2:
Proposal 56 Bills were introduced in the House of
Commons from 2017-19, compared to 93
in the House of Lords – suggests Lords
more significant role in the ‘First reading’
where bill is formally introduced.

Strong argument point 1: Strong argument point 2:
BUT most significant bills begin in the Equally, 52/56 Commons bills received
Commons. Between the 2010 General royal assent, compared to just 67/149 for
Election and October 2021 there were 407 the Lords. In proposing bills, then, (first
Acts of Parliament passed. Of these, 104 reading) it is clear that the Commons’ role
(25.5%) originated in the House of Lords. is more significant.
This is primarily as the Government often
uses the House of Lords to begin the
passage of lower profile bills and therefore
avoid a logjam in the House of Commons.


Paragraph 2: Weak argument point 1: Weak argument point 2:
Debating and
voting In the House of Commons, EU bill received Only the Commons can veto a bill outright
just 4 hours and 37 minutes debate. – Lords remains constitutionally limited.
Similarly, the Internal Markets Bill that set
out how trade would operate within the
UK after Brexit was debated for just 11
hours by the House of Commons.

Between 2016 and 2017 115 peers did not
speak once in the House of Lords – lack of
political engagement limits effectiveness in
debating legislation. The existence of non-
working peers undermines the credibility
and effectiveness of the House.


Strong argument point 1: Strong argument point 2:
As a result of these factors, backbench
In the house of lords more time spent rebellions are rare and Governments can
scrutinizing legislation – backbenchers usually rely on the support of their own
often experts in their fields e.g. Lord MPs. Since the 2019 General Election, of
Adonis is an expert on education – 650 MPs there are 321 who have never
previous academic. Can devote more time: once voted against their own party. Power
whilst the Commons spent just 10 hours of patronage – there are over 100 junior
scrutinizing Agriculture Act (2020), Lords minister roles available as ‘lobbying
spent 96 hours – can go through bills line- fodder’ for which MPs will readily toe the
by-line. party line. Between 1945 and 2019 there
Many peers will only debate and were 19,909 divisions in the House of
contribute to issues they have some level Commons, of which the Government won

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alexupshall. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69252 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$6.21
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added