100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Nuisance (Public, Private and Rylands) $4.57   Add to cart

Class notes

Nuisance (Public, Private and Rylands)

1 review
 117 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Detailed notes on the law relating to nuisance. Contains key principles and cases. These notes helped me achieve a distinction (74).

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • August 26, 2016
  • 11
  • 2015/2016
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: aahrz • 6 year ago

avatar-seller
THE LAW OF TORT

PRIVATE NUISANCE, PU BLIC NUISANCE AND RY LANDS




DEFINITIONS
Private Nuisance Bamford v Turnley Strict liability.

‘the continuous activity or state of affairs CLAIMANT MUST PROVE
causing a substantial and unreasonable
interference with a plaintiff’s land or his use  Continuous activity
or enjoyment of that land.’  Unreasonable interference with…
a) Plaintiff’s land or
b) Use/enjoyment of land


Public Nuisance AG v PYA Quarries CLAIMANT MUST PROVE

‘acts or omissions that materially affect  Act/omission
the…comfort and convenience…of a class of  Materially affects…
people.’  Comfort and convenience
 Class of people


Rylands v Fletcher Rylands v Fletcher Strict liability.

“We think that the true rule of law is that the CLAIMANT MUST PROVE:
person who for his own purpose brings onto
his land and collects and keeps there  That the D brought onto land
anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, accumulated there for his own purposes
must keep it at his peril, and if he does not  Anything likely to do mischief if it
do so, is prima facie answerable for all the escaped
damage that is the natural consequence of  It did escape
the escape.”  Use of D’s land was non-natural
 Caused foreseeable damage
 Blackburn, J

, Private Nuisance

“..any continuous activity or state of affairs causing a substantial and unreasonable interference with a plaintiff’s land or his use and
enjoyment of that land.” (Bamford v Turnley)




Identify parties. Then C must prove: 1. Activity is ongoing 2. Indirect interference 3. Recognised damage 4. Unlawful (unreasonable) interference 5. Defences


 Private nuisance = strict liability and is not actionable per se (must prove loss)

PARTIES

Who can sue?

Claimant must have legal/proprietary interest in the affected land. Licensee/child/spouse is not sufficient. (Malone v Laskey; Hunter v
Canary Wharf; McKenna v British Aluminium; Dobson v Thames Water Utilities)

Who can be sued?

Defendant can be:

1. Most commonly the creator of the nuisance (Thomas v NUM)
2. The occupier of the land where they are authorising the nuisance (Leakey v National Trust)
Occupiers will not usually be held liable for a nuisance created by a third party (independent contractors, trespassers, predecessors,
natural occurring incidents – you would have to sue these parties independently), but there are EXCEPTIONS:
 Independent contractors: occupiers are not normally liable unless in rare cases where the occupier has asked the independent
contractors to conduct tasks that cause a reasonably foreseeable or inevitable nuisance. (Matania v National Provincial Bank).
 Trespassers: occupiers will not usually be held liable for a nuisance created by trespassers (Page Motors v Epsom) unless they
continued or adopted the nuisance (Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan). Occupiers can escape liability if they take reasonable steps to
abate the nuisance.
 Predecessors: occupier not liable for a nuisance that was created by a predecessor in title and existed before the occupier obtained
the land unless they continued or adopted the nuisance.
 Naturally occurring nuisances: occupiers are not usually held liable unless they knew or ought to have known about the danger
and failed to take reasonable steps to abate the nuisance (Goldman v Hargrave). However, a duty to abate depends on the means of
the occupier – not required to act if they are not financially able to. (Holbeck Hall Hotel v Scarborough BC)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GDL1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.57  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart