Summary of the book and seminars Philosophy of Science | RSM premaster
136 views 4 purchases
Course
Wetenschapsfilosofie (BPN1102)
Institution
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
Book
Introduction to the philosophy of the management sciences
This document contains a summary of all the theories in the book Introduction to the Management Sciences by T. van Willigenburg (2012). Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 4 are summarized. In addition, this document also contains important notes from the seminars in the Philosophy of Science course. This course ...
introduction to the philosophy of the management sciences
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
Edition:
ISBN:
Edition:
More summaries for
Philosophy of Science exam summary
Philosophy of Science Summary RSM COMPLETE (based on book & lectures)
All for this textbook (3)
Written for
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
-
Wetenschapsfilosofie (BPN1102)
All documents for this subject (1)
Seller
Follow
Daniquedhs
Reviews received
Content preview
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Management
Sciences
CHAPTER 1: WHY PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE?
Introduction
- Why is scientific knowledge more trustworthy than mundane (everyday knowledge)
- Why do we trust scientific theories
- Management science = social science: examine social phenomena and study people
- Scientific knowledge: aims at knowledge of patterns, structures, regularities, and laws
o Not one specific company or example but about types of businesses
o Goal = to explain and understand phenomena generalisability
- Everyday knowledge: not interested in why
- Scientific research can be tested: trustworthiness requires controllability and therefore
repeatability
Five features of scientific knowledge
1) Generalisability: to explain and understand phenomena
2) Controllability: research needs to be transparent and repeatable
3) Objectivity: independence of external pressure and influence
4) Valid methods: use methods of research which are accepted as valid among scholars
5) Parsimony: clear and simple models of explanation, the simplest explanation is preferred
Scientific research has all five features: validity of scientific claims and results can be trusted
o Trust is not an all or nothing
Misconceptions with regard to the methods in the management sciences (I): only empirical
research counts as scientific
- Misconception: only empirical research counts as scientific
- Empirical social scientific research = research of phenomena using surveys, interviews etc
- Misconception: social scientific research should describe facts and calculate data
o Instead: in social scientific research statistical analysis should be at the core
o Conceptual analysis is always needed: e.g. organisation is a theoretical concept
- Theoretical concepts require philosophical thought to understand their meaning
- Science = also a way of thinking about the world, a way of forming conceptions
- Concepts make it possible to observe phenomena
- Scientific research is more than the gathering and analysis of empirical data
o Careful reasoning is as important as adequate observation
- Gravity is also a theoretical concept: cannot be observed, felt or measured
- Social science and natural sciences: framework of studying reality is built of theoretical concepts
Misconceptions with regard to the nature of management sciences (II): scientific research is only
descriptive, never prescriptive or normative
- Misconception: scientific research is only descriptive, never prescriptive or normative
o About how things are not how they should be, therefore limited to facts
- Normative disagreements are not disagreements of taste but normative issues
- Possible to have a scientific debate about normative questions
- Scientists want to know the truth in both factual sense and normative sense
, The good reason model of truth
- Good reason model of truth: a claim is true if it is supported by the balance of reasons
o This is when the reasons in favour decisively outweigh the reasons against the claim
- Argumentum ad ignorentiam: claim to be true because there is no proof for the opposite
o Fallacious reasoning
- Petitio principii = hidden cicularity: a claim is secretly taken for granted in one of the premises
- False dilemma fallacy: argument offers a false range or choices and requires you to pick one
- Fallacies = defects in arguments which cause an argument to be invalid or weak
- What is reasonable? – understood in three ways
1) Correct methods of research and argumentations – methodological question
2) The status of acquired scientific knowledge – epistemological question
3) The nature of (social) reality – ontological question
“What is reasonable?” as a methodological question
- What are the best methods of research? Quantitative methodology vs. qualitative approach
- Quantitative: statistical analysis and data about the behaviour and opinions of people
o Aimed at finding statistical relations
o Discussions about how to argue with numbers and probabilities
o Reasoning shortcuts: use intuition
“What is reasonable?” as an epistemological question (knowledge)
- What is the status of the ‘knowledge’ we have acquired?
- Reasonable reliably predict the future because of solid statistical relations but the why is unclear
- Question about the reasonableness of one’s theoretical assumptions
o Question about the rationality of the arguments which are based on theoretical assumptions
“What is reasonable?” as an ontological question (that what is)
- Ontological assumptions: assumptions about the nature of the reality which is studied
- Different explanations of social phenomena result in different conclusions
- Reality founded on mutual agreements: €50 bill is worth 10 cents, but we agree to a value of €50
o Value is no part of natural reality of natural science
- Object and phenomena in natural reality exist independently of humans: rocks, trees, planets
- Phenomena dependent of the existence of humans: money, art, fame
- Natural phenomena for their existence also existence of humans: colours
Idealism versus realism
- Idealism: all natural phenomena are nothing more than mental representations
o Trees, rocks and planets are ideas of us and not phenomena that exist in reality
o We only experience different sense-data
o Things only exists when observed: when no one is around things would disappear?
Berkeley’s solution: God is always present
- Realism: acknowledges that reality is always observed by us in a pre-shaped way
o We have learned to individualise objects and phenomena in a particular way
o The Dutch can distinguish eight types of rain: it is real for the Dutch
o Kant says: the capacity to order phenomena in time and in space
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Daniquedhs. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
