100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Pearson (PEARSON)
Psychology 2015
Unit 2 - Cognitive psychology
Other
Hofling Hospital 1966
912 views 4 purchases
Course
Unit 2 - Cognitive psychology
Institution
Pearson (PEARSON)
Hofling Hospital 1966
Hofling (1966) created a more realistic study of obedience than Milgram’s by carrying out field studies on nurses who were unaware that they were involved in an experiment.
Hofling Hospital ::: Field
Aim
Hofling (1966) created a more realistic study of obedience than Milgram’s by carrying out field
studies on nurses who were unaware that they were involved in an experiment.
Method
The procedure involved a naturalistic field experiment involving 22 (real) night nurses. Dr. Smith (a
stooge) phones the nurses at hospital (on 22 separate occasions) and asks them to check to see if
they have the drug astroten.
When the nurse checks she can see that the maximum dosage is supposed to be 10mg. When they
reported to the ‘Doctor’, they were told to administer 20mg of the drug to a patient called ‘Mr.
Jones’. Dr. Smith was in a desperate hurry and he would sign the authorization form when he came
to see Mr. Jones later on.
The nurses were watched to see what they would do. The medication was not real, though the
nurses thought it was.
If the nurse administers the drug, they will have broken three hospital rules:
1. They are not allowed to accept instructions over the phone.
2. The dose was double the maximum limit stated on the box.
3. The medicine itself as unauthorized, i.e. not on the ward stock list.
The drug itself was a harmless sugar pill invented just for the experiment.
Results
21 out of 22 (95%) nurses were easily influenced into carrying out the orders. They were not
supposed to take instructions by phone, let alone exceed the allowed dose (The drug was a placebo).
When other nurses were asked to discuss what they would do in a similar situation (i.e. a control
group), 21 out of 22 said they would not comply with the order.
Conclusion
Hofling demonstrated that people are very unwilling to question supposed ‘authority’, even when
they might have good reason to.
Critical Evaluation + Ethical issue
A strength of this study is that it has high levels of ecological validity, due to the fact it was
conducted in a real life environment. However, the study broke the ethical guideline of deception, as
neither the doctor was real.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller thydngtrn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $0.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
