100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Natural Law ESSAY PLANS- Philosophy & Ethics A Level OCR $4.50
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Natural Law ESSAY PLANS- Philosophy & Ethics A Level OCR

2 reviews
 235 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

5 ESSAY PLANS IN THIS BUNDLE These essay plans helped me get an A* overall in OCR Philosophy & Ethics (Full Marks on ethics paper). Essay Plans discussing the effectiveness of Natural Law when applied to moral decision-making. The essay plans have a particular focus on AO1, so that students a...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • April 3, 2023
  • 10
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: d6192369 • 7 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: aishahmarwa • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
‘Humans are inclined towards good’. Evaluate this statement.

Introduction

Define: Natural law- A deontological theory based on behaviour that accords with given laws or
moral rules that exist independently of human societies and systems.

Importance: Shows that our human nature is designed to be good.

Scholars: Aquinas, Hobbes, Moore, Barth

Conclusion: Humans are not inclined towards good.

Paragraph 1

Point: Humans are not inclined towards good otherwise we would not need the four tiers of law.

Argument: Aquinas- Four laws- ‘a certain rule and measure of acts whereby man is induced to act or
is restrained from acting’- Why do we need to be restrained if we are inclined towards good? Human
Law: The laws of nations- everyday rules that govern our lives. Why do we need human law to be
established if humans are inclined towards good?

Sometimes these laws are flawed and cannot be considered ‘good’ but are still followed e.g. Nazi
leaders on trial for war crimes argued that they were just obeying the law. This was rejected
because the supposed ‘inclination towards good’ that they have within them should have made
them realise what they were doing was wrong.

Karl Barth thought that Natural law relied too much on reason. Since human reason is imperfect, it
does not provide a strong basis for moral decision-making.

Counterargument: Natural law may appear to be exclusively about following rules but this fails to
recognise the role of reason in moral decision- making that Aquinas is concerned about. Natural law
is ‘law-like’ because of its rationality.

Paragraph 2

Point: Humans are inclined towards good because natural law is derived from humans natural
inclination to do good.

Argument: Aquinas thought that in all human beings, ‘there is first of all an inclination to good’
because ‘every substance seeks the preservation of its own being’. Therefore, ‘whatever is a means
of preserving human life, and of warding off its obstacles, belongs to the natural law.’ He therefore
made preservation of life the first of five primary precepts, things that are good and absolute and
describe human flourishing. Primary precepts: To worship God, To live in an ordered society, To
reproduce, To learn, To defend the innocent life.

Counterargument: If the primary precepts are derived from what Aquinas believes are principles
that already apart of human nature, applied through reason, then why are the secondary precepts
brought about to simplify the application of the primary precepts. Surely they should be able to do
good through their own reason without additional guidance.

, Since natural law tries to derive a moral conclusion from a factual premise (the naturalistic fallacy), it
is incoherent. G.E. Moore argues that Natural law depends on what is the definition of good. Good is
unanalysable and unnatural so cannot be defined by any reference to nature.

Paragraph 3

Point: Humans are inclined towards good.

Argument: Aquinas has a positive view of human nature. He thinks that there is a natural response
to do good. The moral laws arise out of this natural response and support the view of a created
world where life flourishes. Though society is diverse, perhaps there are enough common features
among all people for natural law to make sense.

Counterargument: Thomas Hobbes- Human nature is dangerous and murderous. ‘Men from their
very birth, and naturally scramble for everything they covet, and would have the entire world, if they
could, to fear and obey them’.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller temitayoogunbayo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.50  2x  sold
  • (2)
Add to cart
Added