100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting Criminal Law Class 6 $3.21   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting Criminal Law Class 6

 113 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary Criminal Law Class, Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University

Preview 1 out of 13  pages

  • September 24, 2016
  • 13
  • 2015/2016
  • Summary
avatar-seller
1


Class 6: International Criminal Law

Lecture & Literature
Little Bit of History
 Mock trials of war criminals are as old as war itself
 Almost always done by the winning part = victor’s justice
 First time an international effort is made is after WW I
 Art. 227 Versailles Treaty → international trial by 5 powers (US, UK, FR, ITA
and JP) for Emperor Wilhelm II ‘for a supreme offence against international
morality and the sanctity of treaties.

 Second attempt after WW II
 United Nations War Crimes Commission Proposes International Tribunal
 US and UK initially not in favour
o Only SU wants (mock) trial
o Churchill in memo to Stalin → list of 50-100 high ranking Nazi’s

 Stalin persuaded these superpowers to join → Potsdam agreement (1945): Top
Nazi war criminals tried by International Military Tribunal (IMT) in
Nuremberg (location of Reichsparteitagen)
o Four judges (US, FR, USSR and UK)
o 24 accused (most high-ranking is Göring)
o 12 are sentenced to death, rest receives sentences varying from a life
sentence to 10 years imprisonment
 Similar tribunals in Tokyo for Japanese war criminals

 Cold war → Cooperation between world super powers grinds to a halt.
o No political will to set up new war crimes tribunals.
 Only after - 1989 Fall of Berlin wall
 1993 → International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)(The
Hague)
 1994 → International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)(Arusha)
 Enormous costs → ICTY 2006/2007 $276.474.100 (=10% UN budget)
o Solution: Hybrid tribunals (half international/half national)
 An international element is the involvement of the UN, selection
of international judges, the specific law to be applied. The
degree and forms can vary. Courts are typically located in the
country in which the crimes were committed and as a
consequence they are less often perceived as outer interference.
o However, ad hoc solutions were not working.
o 1994-1998 → negotiations about a permanent court (ICC) which started
in 2002.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller karlijnstraaten. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart