100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary B3T3101 Behavioral Management Science Erasmus Bachelor Business Administration/Business Administration $6.69
Add to cart

Summary

Summary B3T3101 Behavioral Management Science Erasmus Bachelor Business Administration/Business Administration

 30 views  4 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

All modules and lectures summarized in English (main language of the course). With this summary, I successfully passed the exam. Sometimes it also includes some additional explanations in Dutch. A number of bonus quizzes have also been developed.

Preview 4 out of 31  pages

  • April 5, 2023
  • 31
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
-pre recorded lectures and readings
-Practice & Q&A session




Literature Lecture slides are mandatory, as well as the following readings:
Module 1: Heuristics & Biases
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science,
185(4157), 1124-1131.
• Dhar, R., & Gorlin, M. (2013). A dual-system framework to understand preference construction
processes in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 528-542.
Module 2: Decisions Under Risk
• Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-
350.
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
American Psychologist, 58(9), 697.
Module 3: Principles of Persuasion
• Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79(9), 72-81.
• Cialdini, R., & Cliffe, S. (2013). The uses (and abuses) of influence. Harvard Business Review, 91(7-8),
76-81. 3
Module 4: Choice Architecture
• Ly, K., Mazar, N., Zhao, M., & Soman, D. (2013). A practitioner's guide to nudging. Rotman School of
Management Working Paper, (2609347).
• Behavioural Insights Team (2014). EAST. Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights.
Module 5: Leader Influence
• Yukl, G., Seifert, C.F., & Chavez, C. (2008). Validation of the extended influence behavior
questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 609-621.
• Antonakis, J., Fenley, M., & Liechti, S. (2012). Learning charisma. Harvard Business Review, 90(6),
127–130.
Module 6: Team Processes
• Hackman, J. R. (2009). Why teams don't work. Interview by Diane Coutu. Harvard Business Review,
87(5), 98- 105.
• Listen to this podcast episode before the practice session: WorkLife by Adam Grant, Season 1, The
Daily Show's secret to creativity: o
https://www.ted.com/talks/worklife_with_adam_grant_the_daily_show_s_secret_to_creativity?
referrer=playlist-worklife_with_adam_grant
Module 7: Hierarchy, Power and Status

,• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and
status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398.
Module 8: Organizational Systems of Influence
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the
organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121-140.
• Listen to this podcast episode before the practice session: This American Life, 561, NUMMI (2015) o
https://www.thisamericanlife.org/561/nummi-2015


Assessment and examinations
You will be assessed on the basis of an individual written test (70%) and two group assignments (15%
each). To pass the course, you have to achieve a minimum grade of 4.5 on the written test, and a
minimum overall grade of 5.5.
Written test (70%). The exam will take place on campus. It will involve a mix of multiple choice
questions and open questions.

Group Assignment 1 (15%). You will propose a campaign that builds on the theories we study in class
and aims at aligning people’s behaviour with the goals of sustainable development. You will design
an experiment aimed at testing the effectiveness of such campaign. You will present your work in a
video.

Group Assignment 2 (15%). We will provide you with a short description of a real organizational case
in collaboration with a firm. Based on the problem described in the case and the provided theories in
class, you will develop an intervention to address the problem. We ask you to design an experiment
aimed at testing the effectiveness of your intervention and describe the experiment in a short paper.



Gabriele’s intro
Warm-up survey > compulsory readings & recordings with narrated slides > live session
Presence is non-mandatory, lectures not recorded,
Exam: 20 MC questions + 2 open questions based on videos, readings, live sessions

,Module 1 heuristics and biases
Videos
A “rational” decision
How Econs* decide…. How about humans?
1. Define the problem
 Why are we making this choices
2. Identify all decision criteria
 What we value In this problem, criteria we should base criteria on
3. Allocate weights to the criteria
 How important is the criteria
4. Identify all alternatives
 What are the solutions to the problem, options you have
5. Evaluate the alternatives
 How scores these options on decision criteria
6. Choose the best alternative
 Which option gives highest value

Bounded Rationality
Resources (time, cognitive, etc.) are limited (vb tafel kopen ga je niet naar alle winkels in het land om
elke tafel te bekijken en dan te kiezen maar naar 1 winkel en daaruit kiezen)
We often don’t optimize, but “satisfice” (e.g., consider only few alternatives)
“Predictable” irrationality
We are not just often “wrong”, We are systematically wrong
That means we can study how we decide

System 1 and system 2
System 1 System 2
Automatic Controlled
Fast Slow
Not cognitively demanding Cognitively demanding
“Intuitive” answer “rational” answer
Heuristics (mental shortcuts to satisfactory solutions)
Efficient because no resources required, and work most of the
time
Biases (systematic deviations from “rationality”) predictable!
2 notes: what’s rational is a debated question & not all ‘biases’ are due to heuristics/system 1

Probability estimation
Eg buying a house, probably that you like it their and it’s a good investment.
Eg going on vacation, weather is gonna be good, you like it their,
How do we make these kind of judgments? What are some of the heuristics we use?

Representativeness heuristics
“The more X resembles Y, the more likely X is to be Y” eg a bird is a duck (looks like, sounds like,
walks like a duck than it’s a duck)
1. How confident are you in this resemble
 Stereotypes are a heuristic, there’re accurate but misleading. But accurate
stereotypes are still stereotypes.
 Information is often not enough
2. How likely is Y in the first place?

,  Representativeness ignores base rates
o Conjunction fallacy
o False positives




Conjunction fallacy: people fail to understand that by definition the base rate is different and
therefore it must be more likely that Linda is a bank teller than being a bankteller + active feminist




False positives:




Availability heuristic:
What makes examples easier to recall: 1. familiarity
e.g. simple study, participant listen to a list of names (50% men’s names, 50% women’s names). One
group had famous men’s names and the other group famous women’s names. “Where there more
men’s names or women’s names in the list?”
2. Recency
e.g. scare for terrorist attacks around “00 because a lot attacks happened.
3. Salience
the quality of being particularly noticeable or important; prominence. E.g. chance to die from
airplane crash in comparison to shark attack or car crash.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bodienstoop1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.69  4x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added