AC 3.2- Draw conclusions from information. [15 marks]
JUST VERDICTS
A just verdict is lawful and proper. It gives justice to the facts of the case,
finding who is guilty and finding the innocent. Justice can be done swiftly,
however sometimes it may take years for a just verdict to be made. However,
the criminal justice system does not always achieve a just verdict.
Stephen Lawrence, a black teenager from London was stabbed and killed in a
racially motivated attack in 1993 while he was waiting for a bus with his friend,
by 5 youths. The case became a cause célèbre, and its effects included a shift in
the public's perception of racism and the police. Additionally, it resulted in the
partial lifting of the restriction on double jeopardy. In 2012, two of the
perpetrators were found guilty of murder. Sir William Macpherson examined
the original metropolitan police service investigation and concluded that the
investigation was incompetent and that the force was institutionally racist. The
mistakes made by the police where that as they arrived at the scene, Lawrence
was bleeding to death and the officers did not admit first aid and they were
also told by witnesses which way the attackers went, and this was ignored.
Nothing was done about a suspect removing a bag that looked like it contained
clothes. 18 years later 2 arrests out of the 5 were made due to heavy
campaigning. However, considering the irresponsibility of the officers, without
the heavy media anger, no arrests would have been made.
In conclusion, the police investigation meant that an unjust verdict was
reached. Failure to conduct the investigation properly meant that a deserved,
lawful and proper verdict was not reached. Due to insufficient evidence, even
after several suspects had been identified, no arrests were made. This led to
Lawrence’s parents to launch a private prosecution that eventually led to three
suspects being acquitted. The use of double jeopardy shows that in high profile
cases verdicts are not always just. The just verdict was eventually achieved by
years of campaign and the appearance and help from Nelson Mandela.
MISCARRIGES OF JUTICE
A miscarriage of justice is generally considered to be when an individual is
tried, convicted and punished for a crime they did not commit. The evidence
presented in the appeal is mostly always fresh evidence that had not been
1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller enloo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
