100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Criminology Unit 3 (AC3.1) - Crime scene to courtroom - Controlled assessment notes $6.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom

Summary

Summary Criminology Unit 3 (AC3.1) - Crime scene to courtroom - Controlled assessment notes
 1 purchase
  • Course
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
  • Institution
  • WJEC

These are summary notes on the whole of AC3.1, they include thorough information on the validity of: Evidence, trial transcripts, media reports, judgements made & law reports. I took these notes into my Criminology Unit 3 controlled assessment (December 2022) and achieved an A. These notes are up t...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • April 16, 2023
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

  • criminology
  • unit3
  • unit 3
  • crime scene to courtroom
  • ac31
  • a

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
All documents for this subject (388)

Seller

avatar-seller
lilyrobinson0805

Reviews received

Content preview

AC 3.1: Examine information for validity (15 marks)
Remember to use the key terms - Bias, opinion, circumstances, currency and accuracy
Brief Intro: Evidence
There are 3 types of evidence that can be put forward by the prosecution and defence; Eyewitness
testimony, Expert witness statements and Forensic evidence. The evidence is examined by the jury
who then decide on a verdict based on how accurate they believe it is.
Case studies
Ronald Cotton – Cotton was wrongly convicted of rape after being incorrectly chosen in a police
line-up. It has been suggested that the police were racist, as they believed a middle-class white
woman (Jennifer Thompson) over a black male, which shows police bias. The evidence presented
to the jury during trial was inaccurate, as Thompson had picked out the wrong man (it was actually
Bobby Poole) Currency effected the case, as during the time that passed between the when
Thompson was attacked and the line-up her memory will be affected.
Sally Clark – Clark was convicted of killing her 2 infant sons after Roy Meadows opinion in court
was that the chances of 2 children dying of the condition was 1 in 73 million, which was
inaccurate and not based on real statistics. The circumstances of Meadows meant he was believed
by the jury, as he was seen as credible and the jury were ‘blinded by science’.
How the information might be invalid
Ronald Cotton – The evidence in this case was invalid, as Jennifer Thompson’s memory was
affected due to the length of time between the attack and the police line-up, where the police used
leading questions. A study by Loftus and Palmer proves that leading questions change how a
person recalls an event.
Sally Clark – The evidence was invalid, as the jury relied solely on Roy Meadows statement,
which led to a miscarriage of justice when Clark was convicted.
Link to the brief?
Brief conclusion
Overall, the evidence presented in the trial by the prosecution or defence is decided on its validity
by the jury/magistrates, so they can put as much weight on the evidence (physical/testimonial) as
they see fit.


Remember to use the key terms - Bias, opinion, circumstances, currency and accuracy
Brief Intro: Trial Transcripts
A trial transcript is an exact written record of everything spoken in court, it is done through a
recording device (DARTS)
How valid are Trial Transcripts
§ They are VERY accurate, as it is a specific recording of what's spoken during a trial.
§ Using DARTS means it is unbiased, as it's from an objective point of view and not
someone's interpretation.
How the information might be invalid
§ Body language is not recorded, which can change how statements are perceived.
§ There is a risk of the technology malfunctioning, which could cause the loss of valuable
information.
§ Some words might not be recorded due to slang and accents (A study conducted by the
BBC showed that black, Asian and minority ethnic groups words were not transcribed
correctly)
§ Depending on the circumstances of the trial, noise in the background of court can disrupt
the recording, for example the mother of Charlie Guard was removed from court for being
disruptive, so other statements in court might not be picked up by DARTS.
Link to the brief?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lilyrobinson0805. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$6.99  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added