Professional negligence = negligence within professional sphere
o E.g. activities of accountants, lawyers, surveyors or architects
Clinical negligence = negligence within medical professions and services
o Inc. nurses, dentists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, ambulance
services
Main difference from normal negligence = establishing if particular
professional duty of care has been breached
Functions of malpractice litigation
1. Accountability
2. High standards
3. Justifications when procedures go wrong
4. Compensation
5. Retribution
1. Main claims against doctors
2. Primary claims against hospital (primary negligence) – together
3. Vicarious claims against hospital (vicariously for torts of doctors) –
together
All healthcare professionals owe patients DoC to exercise reasonable care
and skill once they accept patient for treatment (Cassidy v Ministry of
Health)
o Medical professionals do not owe DoC where no direct
relationship, e.g. where providing advice for occupational health
report (Kapfunde v Abbey National plc)
Duty of care to write clearly (legibly) for purpose of prescriptions
(Prendergast v Sam & Dee Ltd)
o Incorrect dispensing of a drug because doctor’s handwriting could
not be deciphered – 25% doctor liability; 75% pharmacist
Health authorities/trusts/hospitals have DoC to patients (Bull v Devon)
DoC of solicitor to client (Ross v Caunters)
Breach of duty of care
Facts – Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
C required treatment for depression
Two bodies of medical opinion as to electro-convulsive therapy
o Relaxant drugs
o No drugs
Fracture of C’s pelvis as no drugs used
Bolam test
1. Standard of care = standard of a reasonable, competent professional X
(Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee)
o As established in Wilsher v Essex AHA, the (lack of) experience of D
will not raise / lower the standard of care owed, as the standard is
objective, attaching to the act and not the actor (catheter into vein
rather than artery leading, it is argued, to blindness))
o Trainees may not be in breach if they seek advice from more
senior colleague (as in Wilsher), where liability falls on more
senior colleague
o Health authority may be liable where puts a junior doctor in a
situation with little / no supervision (Bull and another v Devon
AHA)
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller unpocodetodo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.