100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
2.1C cognitive Psychology: Thinking and Remembering Summary $7.75
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
  4.  
  5. Cognitive Psychology: Thinking and Remembering (FSWP2014A)

Summary

2.1C cognitive Psychology: Thinking and Remembering Summary

 3 purchases
  • Course
  • Cognitive Psychology: Thinking and Remembering (FSWP2014A)
  • Institution
  • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)

If you are looking for a high-quality study summary document that provides a concise and informative overview of 2.1C Cognitive Psychology look no further ! My study summary notes are easily understandable. l provide you with all the necessary knowledge you need to master your exam I try to ...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 87  pages

Document information

  • April 22, 2023
  • 87
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

Subjects

  • cognitive psychology
  • erasmus university
  • keywords
  • readings
  • international bachelor
  • exam preparation
  • 21c
  • 21c thinking and remembering
  • summary

Written for

  • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
  • Psychologie
  • Cognitive Psychology: Thinking and Remembering (FSWP2014A)
All documents for this subject (9)

Seller

avatar-seller
lara9

Reviews received

Content preview

Cognitive Psychology:

2.1.C Thinking and Remembering

1. Wheres your head at?

inattentional blindness : failure to notice unexpecte if attention focused else

 Ex. police man didnt notice incident while running past
o In gorilla exp. More likely to notice gorilla if paying attention to black shirt
team than white shirt team
 perceive only what has the attention→ cognitive effort needed

We tend to notice stimuli that have similar characteristics to the target stimulus (inattentional
bias)

 cognitive deaf due to selected attention
 rapidly task switch no multitask
 not expected to look out for unexpected and 1 task focused
 can only perceive one stream of info at a time and filter others→ not aware

It is functional because you can allocate more of your energy to the task at hand, making it an
evolutionary advantage; maybe there were less unexpected elements before (hence why they
are unexpected), and now more exterior stimuli.

And maybe we don’t know how much we experience it because we don’t see the said
unexpected elements on a daily basis.

The results of all the experiments show Inattentional blindness

 People are more likely to notice unexpected objects that share features with the items
in a display (e.g., if the gorilla was white)
 Another factor that influences noticing objects is the effort you put into the attention
demanding task
 For example when you have to track faster moving objects you dedicate all your
attention to tracking that object → shows how limited attention is
 limited attentional capacity

Neisser, 1979 → designed a variant of his original task to test the power of selective attention
to induce failure of awareness (very similar to the gorilla video we watched)

far worse without inanttentional blindness→ In order not to get overwhelmed by the
information

Inattentional blindness occurs when you arent paying attention

while attentional blink occurs while you are paying attention

. Ex. gorilla exp didnt know what to expect (inattentional blindness) and attentional blink
they are aware of the task

,dichotic listening task:

→ when someone is listening to different sounds in each ear and you focus on one of the
sounds

2 speech streams → repeat one not notice changes in other

 Affected by loudness, pitch
 Leads to cognitive deafness due to selective listening

You have a headphone on and you are listening to 2 people speak at the same time but you
are asked to repeat the person in your left ear as quickly and accurately as you can. You tend
to miss any changes in language/comprehensibility of the speech. You may only notice big
physical changes (like the speaker going from male to female)

 process of receiving different auditory messages presented simultaneously to each ear.
Not noticing a switch in language in one of the ears throughout the task is very
common

Dichotic listening refers to the procedure whereby a separate message is administered to each
ear.

Shadowing refers to the participant's task to attend to one of those messages.

Different versions of the dichotic listening test:

 participants didn’t notice a change in semantics or language (even backwards)
 however they noticed the change from male to female voice
 30% shifted attention when hearing their name

choosing to focus on one sound

Task switching was intentional and an alternative to multitasking

Factors affecting:

o sound intensity
o distinctive sensory characteristics
o location (turning your ear towards the source)
o gestures (reading lips for example)

selective listening:filter info from awareness

The selective listening task: Highlights the power of blocking out extraneous information to
keep our focus on one thing we want to focus on. It can still a have consequences tho and that
is that we may miss the most important things that are happening

 Theses issues are the same for visual tasks (the gorilla experiment or the umbrella
woman by Neisser)

,dichotic (visual) : overlapping events, partially transparent, same space→ both sensory
signal

Dichotic presentation

 the visual version of the listening
 monitor event→ fail notice→ stuff happen but not know meaning→ limited
attentional capacity
 more likely to notice if unexpected shares features with attended
 depends on how much effort put in demanded task→ more dedicated→ more likely
miss

Neisser & Becken 1975 → devised a visual analogue of the dichotic listening task

 Two distinct but partially transparent videos with a bit of overlap. E.g. one with a
hand-clapping game and another with ball passing.
 Participants often failed to notice unexpected events in the ignored video stream →
they were unaware of events happening outside the focus of their attention.
 Two teams (black and & white) passing a ball, the people were slightly transparent
and occupied the same space in the video
 Halfway throughout the video a woman in a raincoat and umbrella walks through
 Participants were so focused on the ball passing that they often missed the “umbrella
woman”

Simon and Chabris (1999) → replicated Neisser’s work

 Designed the ‘Monkey business illusion’
 This time, no transparency and filmed with only one camera
 Participants still failed to notice the gorilla ~50% of the time

Intuition → everyone’s intuition says that we don’t miss events or object, counterintuitive
however because it is very hard for an individual to notice something they have missed by
themselves (no scientist telling us what it is we missed). Our personal experiences deceive
us… “mistaken intuition”

(Individual) differences in noticing/attention

 the effort of the task you’re focusing on
 personal significance
 if the unexpected object is similar to the focused object it is easier to notice
 studies suggest that people with greater working memory capacity are better at
noticing unexpected events
 however other studies suggest that people with a bigger working memory capacity
are not more likely to spot an unlikely object or event

inattentional deafness: condition focus attention→ hear less unattended

inattentional deafness → failure to identify a certain noise while listening to one thing

 Inattentional blindness → related to visual

, o Exp. pedestrian on a call, didnt notice cycling clown because they were
distracted

when listening to a set of localized conversations over headphones, people often fail to hear
the voice of a person walking through the scene repeating “I am a gorilla”

 unaware of failure to detect → confident would notice

1. experience is misleading
2. unexpected occurs infrequently

nattentional deafness vs. dichotic listening: consider how many messages are being
communicated in each task and which one of these go unnoticed

1. the inattentional deafness experiments tests auditory inattentional blindness (you
listen to a message and you don’t hear when someone talks about gorillas) while the
dichotic experiments also tests shadowing (conscious switching attention from one
hear to another).

****is the same concept as inattentional blindness. When they are listening to two different
audios and they are asked to pay attention to something else they can miss important/unusual
things happening in the audio.

 Auditory distraction can induce real-world failure to see. E.g., when someone is
driving while talking on the phone they may not see important things that are
happening

Moral of the story: focused attention causes us to see and hear far less of the unattended
information than we might expect. Depending on how similar the unexpected thing is to the
ignored elements and how distracted you are

 Evolutionary perspective
o Ability to focus intently assisted survival and overcame inattentional
blindness/deafness in survival situations
o Increased needs to train focus nowadays
 Ex. driving car while calling need to be extra focused
 mostly focused on phrase being missed out

Is everyone susceptible to this inattentional blindness/deafness?

→ Answer is still controversial

1. Studies suggest that those who have a greater working memory capacity are more
likely to notice the unexpected event.
2. Other studies don’t suggest that and don’t find such a relationship.

Working memory

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lara9. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71241 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Class notes ·

(0)

Volledige lesnotities Bijzondere Overeenkomsten 2022

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

CPPS: Study Guide Exam Questions with Correct Answers

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

AMH 2097 Mid Term Exam- Pam Robbins Rated 100% Correct!!

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

NU240 GERO Final Exam Practice Questions and Answers

Package deal ·

(0)

Package deal for BLAW EXAM WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

FDNYC G60 Practice Exam Correct Questions & Answers!!

Summary ·

(4)

Samenvatting boek: ADHD: macht & misverstanden. SPO/RUG

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

CMY3706 Assignment 1 Full Solutions Semester 2 2024 (618440)

Summary ·

(0)

Samenvatting artikelen college 6 justitieel ingrijpen

$7.75  3x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added