Summary
Summary - Easements (Land Law)
- Course
- Institution
Brief and summarising notes on the law behind easements with regards to property in England and Wales - cases, notes and summaries
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
charlie01jones
Content preview
EasementsTuesday, 16 November 2021 21:18
Easements are a right annexed to land to utilize other land of different ownership in a particular
manner (not involving the taking of any part of the natural produce of the land or any part of its soil)
or to prevent the owner of the other land from utilizing his land in a particular manner.
Rules of what is classed as an easement - Re Ellenborough Park (1956)
- Dominant and servient land
○ Dominant - land that benefits
○ Servient - land with the right over it
- Benefits the dominant land
○ Must affect the land directly rather than benefit the individual owner of the land
○ Re Ellenborough Park was quite controversial as it involved the right to use a park - the
CoA held that the park constituted in a real and intelligible sense, a garden
○ Regency Villas Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd timeshare owners claimed a right to
use a swimming pool and other recreational facilities - these were held to be capable of
being easements
- Diversity of ownership
○ A person cannot have an easement over his own land
○ Landlord and tenant can be classed as different ownership
- Capable of being granted
○ List of easements is not closed
○ Must be sufficiently certain
▪ No
□ View (William Aldred's Case (1610))
□ Privacy (Browne v Flower (1911))
□ TV signal (Hunter v Canary Wharf (1997))
▪ Yes
□ Noise (Lawrence v Fen Tigers (2014))
○ No positive obligation on the servient owner
▪ Fences are an exception to the rule
○ No new negative easements
○ No claim to possession
▪ Storage
□ Wright v Macadam (1949) - the right to store coal in the shed was an
easement
▪ Parking
□ Copeland v Greenhalf (1952) - storing vehicles on a strip of land was not
supported by authority
□ Moncrief v Jameson (2007) - was possible to have an easement to park
□ London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke (1992) - exercisable
Expressly granted easements
- Must be by deed under s52 LPA 1925
- Must be registered
Impliedly created easements
- Common intention
○ Looks at intended use of the dominant land
- Necessity
○ For example, the dominant land could not be used if there was not an easement
- S62 LPA
- The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows
Land Law Page 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlie01jones. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.13. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79079 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now