summary european union law foundations maastricht university
Written for
Maastricht University (UM)
European Law School
European Union Law Foundations
All documents for this subject (9)
Seller
Follow
Safari
Reviews received
Content preview
6. Preliminary Ruling
6. Preliminary Ruling
Preliminary Ruling
Art. 267 TFEU Purpose Who can refer? Circumstances of referral Interim measures
referral of uniform interpretation all courts and tribunals four a) interpretation of EU law lengthy period between
questions on EU of EU law criteria (Broeckmeulen) - courts of last instance obliged reference and judgment by
law to ECJ by - national courts no 1. independent to refer (Art. 267(3) TFEU) ECJ national courts
national courts competence to - impartial and with no two exceptions (CILFIT) required to grant interim
preliminary ruling declare EUlaw interest in outcome of 1) acte éclairé: materially relief
by ECJ on invalid! (Fotofrost) dispute (Corbiau) identical matter already a) relief against autonomous
interpretation of development of EU law 2. established by law decided upon national provision
Treaties and judicial review of EU 3. compulsory jurisdiction 2) acte clair: provision so incompatible with EU law
validity of acts of institutions 4. taking decisions of judicial clear that no reasonable - national court must do
institutions - individuals nature doubt on application everything to secure
direct relationship challenging national - no arbitration panels - all other courts discretion to effectiveness of ECJ
between national measure lower courts not bound by appeal refer (Art. 267(2) TFEU) judgment (Factortame)
courts and ECJ implementing EU of higher court to refer b) validity of EU law b) relief against national law
- measure in national (Rheinmühlen) - all courts obliged to refer implementing EU law
court with - irrespective of national - only ECJ power to declare EU question of validity of EU
presumption of legislation act invalid (Fotofrost) law
referral (Fotofrost) for national courts to decide on ECJ decision bindingon referring - applicant must prove
institutional balance facts and whether reference in court (Benedetti) serious and irreparable
dispute resolution: accordance with national laws or - but free to refer same question damage, weighed
reference must not (WWF) back to ECJ against EU interest in
meaningfully contribute - but ECJ power to refuse priority ruling in two procedures not having measure
to resolution of dispute reference if dispute 1. accelerated procedure in disapplied
(Foglia) hypothetical or factual and exceptionally urgent cases (Zuckerfabrik,
legal context not properly 2. urgent procedure if reference Martini)
explained (Foglia) ‘quite with regard to person in
obvious test‘ (Plato Plastik) custody
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Safari. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.23. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.