Indirect discrimination
Sunday, 10 October 2021 13:41
Examples of indirect discrimination:
- 'Aged 18-30'
○ Prince v Civil Service Commission (No. 2) [1978] IRLR 3 (IT)
○ Jones v University of Manchester [1993] ICR 474 (CA)
- 'Local experience'
○ Meer v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [1988] IRLR 399 (CA)
- 'Good command of English'
○ Perera v Civil Service Commission (No. 2) [1983] ICR 428 (CA)
- 'Management experience'
○ Falkirk Council v Whyte [1997] IRLR 560 (EAT)
- 'Last in first out' redundancy selection
○ Brook v Haringey LB [1992] IRLR 478 (EAT)
○ Hall v Shorts Missile Systems [1996] NI 214 (NICA)
- Length of Service pay scale
○ Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27
History of indirect discrimination
- Began in the United States with the Civil Rights Act 1964 making it unlawful to 'discriminate'
Griggs v Duke Power 401 US 424 (1971)
○ Powerplant divided into 5 departments
○ The labour segment was the dirtiest and had the lowest paid jobs
○ Out of 95 employees at the plant, 14 were black
○ There were only 14 workers in the labour department, and all 14 black workers made up
that workforce
○ No evidence of direct discrimination
○ To work at the other departments you were required to have a high school diploma
○ Only 12% of black people completed high school in the area - compared to 32% of white
people
○ Brought a claim for indirect discrimination in terms of the high school diploma
requirement - Supreme Court agreed
The elements of indirect discrimination
- Equality Act 2010, s. 19
○ A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if they apply a provision, criterion or
practice which is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B's
○ For the purposes of subsection 1, a provision, criterion or practice is discriminatory in
relation to a protected characteristic if;
▪ A applies or would apply it to persons with whom B does not share the
characteristic
▪ It puts or would put persons whom B shares the characteristic at a particular
disadvantage when compared with persons whom B does not share the
characteristic
▪ It puts or would put B at that disadvantage
▪ A cannot show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
In short:
1. A provision, criterion or practice (PCP)
2. Which puts or would put
3. The claimant and the claimant's group at a particular disadvantage
4. With no justification
Equality Law Page 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlie01jones. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.12. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.